Question: What is the easiest way to understand complex numbers and their forms?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding complex numbers and their forms, particularly in the context of solving quadratic equations involving complex solutions. The original poster expresses difficulty in grasping the concept and seeks clarification on specific equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various definitions and representations of complex numbers, including their forms and properties. There are attempts to solve quadratic equations and questions about the implications of complex solutions. Some participants suggest exploring polar and Cartesian forms of complex numbers.

Discussion Status

Guidance has been offered regarding the nature of complex numbers and their operations. Participants are exploring different methods to approach the problems, including the use of quadratic formulas and polar coordinates. There is an ongoing exchange of ideas without a clear consensus on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note confusion stemming from the definitions and representations of complex numbers, as well as the specific requirements of homework assignments. The discussion includes references to specific equations and the need for clarity on the terms used in complex number theory.

Xmo91
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Im am having trouble grasping the concept of complex numbers, could anyone please take the time to explain it. I have asked my lecturer but his help just seems to confuse me more. I have also searched the internet looking for explanations but that is giving me mixed messages.

Homework Equations


The equation that I am currently working on is probably really easy but could anyone explain it?

z^2 + 4iz-3 =0

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Xmo91!

The equation is a quadratic equation in z, it has two solutions, which are both complex numbers in this case. You can solve it with the usual formula for quadratic equations.

There are several ways to define complex numbers, but all equivalent, which may be the reason you got "mixed messages" (could you be more specific?).

Complex numbers are just pairs (a,b) of real numbers, which are usually written as a+bi (a is the real part, b is the imaginary part). To compute with complex numbers you can use the usual properties from the real numbers, the only new thing you need to know is that i^2=-1. Complex numbers take some getting used to, but once you have mastered the basics, they are really not much more difficult then the real numbers to work with.
There is of course a lot more to say about complex numbers, but I could only repeat what you find in other internet resources, for example http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complex_numbers" .

I suggest you take a look at some of the available texts and ask more specific questions if there is something you don't understand.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Welcome to PF!

Hi Xmo91! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Complex numbers generally work the same way as real numbers …

the only difficulty usually is when you have a fraction, like (a +ib)/(c + id), which you deal with by the trick of multiplying both top and bottom by (c - id), to make the bottom real …

try solving your problem …
Xmo91 said:
z^2 + 4iz-3 =0
… just like any ordinary quadratic equation:

what do you get? :smile:
 
To expand a bit on something tiny-tim mentioned, anytime you have a complex number a+bi and you multiply by that number's conjugate a-bi, you always end up with a real number n+0i which equals n.

ex. (2+3i)(2-3i)=4-6i+6i-9(i2)
=4-9(-1)
=4-(-9)
=4+9
=13
 
Last edited:
I got a similar eqn in class so i worked through it and got this:

Z^2 + 2iz -4=0

x=(-b+/- sqrt(b^2 - 4ac))/2a

where a=1 b=2i and c=-4

x=[-2i+/- sqrt(2i^2 - 4x1x-4)]/2x1
x=[-2i+/- sqrt(2(-1) - (-16))]/2
x=[-2i+/- sqrt(-2 - (-16))]/2
x=[-2i+/- sqrt(14)]/2
x=[-2i+3.741]/2 or x=[-2i-3.741]/2
at this stage i was alittle confused as to what was my next step, so i just simplified my answer
x=-i+1.8705 or x=-i-1.8705
 
x=[-2i+/- sqrt(2i^2 - 4x1x-4)]/2x1

should be (2i)^2, not 2i^2.
 
Hi Xmo91! :smile:

(have a square-root: √ and try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)
Xmo91 said:
at this stage i was alittle confused as to what was my next step, so i just simplified my answer
x=-i+1.8705 or x=-i-1.8705

Yes, and then the usual way of writing the result would be x = -i ± 1.8705 …

except of course, as yyat :smile: points out, you need to re-do that square-root :wink:
 
Thanks for the help guys, just one more thing before this thread dies, can anyone please explain what the following question is asking me to do?

Find the values of z that satisfy z^3 = √i and then I'm asked to express it in Cartesian form, which i know has to do with that circle diagram (the name slips my mind).
 
Xmo91 said:
Thanks for the help guys, just one more thing before this thread dies, can anyone please explain what the following question is asking me to do?

Find the values of z that satisfy z^3 = √i and then I'm asked to express it in Cartesian form, which i know has to do with that circle diagram (the name slips my mind).
It's a little hard to answer because you haven't told us what you DO know. since you mention "Cartesian form", a+ bi, do you know the "polar form", [itex]r(cos(\theta)+ i sin(\theta))[/itex]? Do you know that can be written in "exponential form", [itex]r e^{i\theta}[/itex]?

It you know polar form then you probably also know DeMoivre's theorem that says that
[tex][r(cos(\theta)+ i sin(\theta))]^n= r^n(cos(n\theta)+ i sin(n\theta))[/tex]

That applies for any real n, including fractions so
[tex][r (cos(\theta)+ i sin(\theta))]^{1/n}= r^{1/n}(cos(\theta/n)+ i sin(\theta/n))[/itex]<br /> and by adding [itex]2\pi i[/itex] repeatedly to [itex]\theta[/itex] you can get all n roots.<br /> <br /> i itself can be written [itex]1(cos(\pi/2)+ i sin(\pi/2)[/itex] since [itex]cos(\pi/2)= 0[/itex] and [itex]sin(\pi/2)= 1[/itex]. So [itex]\sqrt{i}= cos(\pi/4)+ i sin(\pi/4)[/itex]. You can use DeMoivre's theorem to find the three cube roots of that.<br /> <br /> <br /> (There is an ambiguity here. If the problem had be to solve z<sup>6</sup>= i, there would be 6 roots because i is the square of both [itex]cos(\pi/4)+ i sin(\pi/4)[/itex] and [itex]-cos(\pi/4)- i sin(\pi/4)[/itex]. Here I have use the real number convention that [itex]\sqrt{}[/itex] refers only to the "positive" root but, since the complex numbers do not form an ordered field, that distinction is not really valid.)[/tex]
 
  • #10
Xmo91 said:
Find the values of z that satisfy z^3 = √i and then I'm asked to express it in Cartesian form, which i know has to do with that circle diagram (the name slips my mind).

Quick answer …

Polar form: re (that's your "circle diagram" :wink:)

Cartesian form: x + iy​

Cartesian form is easier for most questions, but polar form is easier for questions like z3 = √i :smile:

The names are the same as for coordinates:

Polar coordinates: (r,θ)
Cartesian coordinates: (x,y)​
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K