Question with solution, confused on how time was found.

  • Thread starter Thread starter I'm Awesome
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a skier sliding down a ski jump and the calculation of time taken to fall a vertical distance. The time is derived using the equation t = sqrt(2h/g), which is based on the one-dimensional motion equation for vertical distance. Participants express confusion over how this equation applies to the problem's parameters, specifically the definitions of D, h, and H. There is also mention of a broken link that may have contained additional context or a diagram for clarity. Understanding the relationship between these variables is crucial for solving the problem effectively.
I'm Awesome
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A skier (m=59.0 kg) starts sliding down from the top of a ski jump with negligible friction and takes off horizontally. If h = 6.60 m and D = 10.6 m, find H.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



The solution was provided, this is a sample problem. I'm just very confused in how t was found to be sqrt(2h/g)

http://imgur.com/a/UuRNp

UuRNp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I assume you are referring to the fourth line where time was substituted out using the equation
$$t=\sqrt{\frac{2h}{g}}$$.
This is simply the time taken for an object to fall a vertical distance ##h## and comes from re-arranging the one-dimensional motion equation
$$x=\frac{1}{2}at^{2}$$
and using ##h## for vertical distance and ##g## for acceleration.
 
I'm Awesome said:

Homework Statement


A skier (m=59.0 kg) starts sliding down from the top of a ski jump with negligible friction and takes off horizontally. If h = 6.60 m and D = 10.6 m, find H.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



The solution was provided, this is a sample problem. I'm just very confused in how t was found to be sqrt(2h/g)

http://imgur.com/a/UuRNp

UuRNp
How are D, h and H defined in the question? The link to the solution works, but it looks like there is also a broken link, perhaps to the original question, or a diagram of it?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top