Questions about charged objects in isolation

  • Thread starter Thread starter teetar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charged Isolation
AI Thread Summary
A charged object suspended by an insulating thread will eventually lose its charge due to interactions with the surrounding atmosphere, as no insulator is perfect. The charge may neutralize over time, influenced by the type of atmosphere, but in a vacuum, it would remain charged. The assumption of neutrality for such objects should be clarified in questions; if not stated, one should proceed with the best available information. Ultimately, real-world conditions ensure that charged objects do not remain charged indefinitely. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurate assessments in physics.
teetar
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
Not sure if the title accurately conveys my questions, but my question is, in such a situation that an object is charged and in hanging from an insulating thread, will it eventually lose its charge? This seems extremely simplistic, and my instinct is to say of course, but for whatever reason this doesn't seem right to me. Would the charge (positive or negative) not eventually be neutral due to interactions with the atmosphere around it? Would the answer to this differ based on the type of atmosphere the object is suspended it? I can't imagine that it wouldn't eventually reach neutrality unless it were in a vacuum, and there was nothing to exchange charge with, but something about that thought also seems wrong. Is it possible that there wouldn't be enough charged particles in the atmosphere around the sphere for it to reach neutrality? In a less real sense, when prompted with the "object hanging by an insulating thread" question, should I assume it means the object is neutral?

Thanks for any guidance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the real world the object would indeed eventually lose its charge. There are no perfect insulators.

teetar said:
In a less real sense, when prompted with the "object hanging by an insulating thread" question, should I assume it means the object is neutral?

It should say that the object is neutral if it's neutral. If not, well, just do the best you can.
 
Drakkith said:
In the real world the object would indeed eventually lose its charge. There are no perfect insulators.
It should say that the object is neutral if it's neutral. If not, well, just do the best you can.

Alright, thanks!
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.

Similar threads

Back
Top