Questions about dative covalent bond and complexes

  • Thread starter Thread starter chatelier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bond
AI Thread Summary
A dative covalent bond does not necessarily result in a +1 charge for the atom forming the bond; rather, it depends on the specific context of the bonding. In the case of the transition metal complex [Cu(H2O)6]2+, the water molecules do not become +1 charged after bonding with Cu2+, as the positive charge is distributed throughout the complex. This distribution of charge can make it difficult to pinpoint the charge on individual atoms within a complex. The example of carbon monoxide illustrates that charge can be delocalized, complicating the understanding of charge distribution in complexes. Overall, the behavior of charge in dative covalent bonds varies based on the molecular structure and the nature of the atoms involved.
chatelier
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
does an atom necessarily becomes +1 charged after forming a dative covalent bond with another atom?

just like something I learned in organic chem:
C6H5-H2N:+ H+ ------> C6H5-H2N+→H
the positive charge of H+ is transferred to the N atom as N forms a dative covalent bond with it.

analogically, in a transition metal complex like [Cu(H2O)6]2+, will each H2O molecule becomes +1 charged after forming dative covalent bond with Cu2+ ?

but should that be the case, Cu will then become -4 charged as 6 H2O molecules have formed dative covalent bonds with it...

but that sounds strange ^ ^ @@@@@
 
Physics news on Phys.org
well the web says the +ve charge should spread over the whole of the complex, so that means in no way can i know the charge on a specific atom?

also, how can i know when the charge will spread over and when it won't? just like the example quoted from the website, the positive charge will just stay on the N atom in NH3BF3.

hey i really got confused with dative covalent bond now.
 
Astronuc said:
But look at the example of carbon monoxide, CO.

um...actually how can the example of CO help me understand the structure of [Cu(H2O)6]2+ ?
 
seems no one can help...~~
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top