Questions about EM wave in material

AI Thread Summary
To find the induced current density from an electromagnetic (EM) wave in a material, one should utilize Maxwell's Equations rather than kinematic equations, as the behavior of charges is influenced by the material's permittivity and permeability. The current density can be expressed as the product of charge density and velocity, but the specific approach depends on the material and geometry involved. For electrostatic cases, Poisson's Equation is applicable, while computational methods like finite element analysis are often required for more complex scenarios. EM wave propagation can be hindered by material losses, with good conductors like gold and copper effectively blocking RF and microwave frequencies. At low frequencies, thicker materials are needed to prevent wave propagation, while higher frequencies involve additional factors such as plasmonics.
kirk404
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How can I find the induced current density by EM wave in a material?
Should I have ma = Fbinding + Fdriving + Fdamping like treating it as a spring?
Then the current density should be charge density of the material x velocity (ρv), isn't it?
Is there any condition the EM wave cannot propagate?
Thank you very much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would not use kinematic equations, you would use Maxwell's Equations and model the behavior of the charges in the bulk by the permittivity and permeability. This is a rather complex process though. If you are talking about the electrostatic case, then we use Poisson's Equation to find the potential, charge, and electric field distributions. If we are talking about electromagnetic waves, then we would use the full Maxwell Equations. The process to find the charge and current densities depend upon the material and geometry of the specific problem. This can be done in closed form for a small set of problems but in general we use computational electromagnetic solvers like the method of moments, finite difference time-domain, or finite element method to solve for the current and charge distributions.

As for preventing wave propagation, any loss in the material would cause this (dependent upon the thickness of the material with respect to the wavelength). In general, any good conductor, like gold, silver, copper, aluminium, have high enough conductivities that most RF and microwave electromagnetic waves are prevented from propagating. Low frequency waves (say kilohertz and below) will take a rather thick block of even a good conductor to extinguish. And for frequencies in the Terahertz range and above, there are additional physics like plasmonics and quantum that dictate the transparency of the material.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top