A Questions about magnetic monopoles

phoenix95
Gold Member
Messages
81
Reaction score
23
So far as I know there are no monopoles in the electro-weak sector of standard model. So people look for it in the GUT and SUSY sectors. However, they are predicted to be heavy(order of Planck mass). There have been studies from LHC attempting to detect monopoles. So here are my questions:

1. If monopoles are too heavy to be detected at LHC, then why look for them? Are there theories why predict them to be lighter than GUTs? Or am I missing anything?
2. Why all cosmology theories only talk about monopoles of GUTs? One can construct monopoles from SU(3) of strong interaction and/or flavor as well, can't they?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Should experimenters only look for things predicted by theory? We would never have discovered the muon that way.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke, Paul Colby and phoenix95
I think I figured out the answers to my question:

phoenix95 said:
2. Why all cosmology theories only talk about monopoles of GUTs? One can construct monopoles from SU(3) of strong interaction and/or flavor as well, can't they?
SU(3) of the color, doesn't intrinsically carry an electromagnetic charge. Or to put it more appropriately: The electromagnetic charge is constructed from flavor generators of SU(3) and not color. But the flavor symmetry is explicitly broken. Hence there are no monopoles in SU(3) (flavor or color).

phoenix95 said:
1. If monopoles are too heavy to be detected at LHC, then why look for them? Are there theories why predict them to be lighter than GUTs? Or am I missing anything?
Well, if they do then it corresponds to a gauge group that has a weaker coupling compared to GUTs. It can also be viewed like this: GUTs simply present a falsifiable argument saying "Monopoles cannot be detected at present scales available", and the experiments are simply testing that.

I hope someone can correct me if I am wrong in any of the above.

Vanadium 50 said:
Should experimenters only look for things predicted by theory? We would never have discovered the muon that way.
I absolutely agree. Experimenters should be the impudent brats as they are since otherwise theorists can only be writing fantasies.
 
GUT theories predict that monopoles are created at high energies (but not as high as Planck energy) at an early cosmological era. If so, they should be still visible in the present Universe (unless inflation diluted them).
 
  • Like
Likes phoenix95
I came across the following paper by Mir Faizal, Lawrence M Krauss, Arshid Shabir, and Francesco Marino from BC. Consequences of Undecidability in Physics on the Theory of Everything Abstract General relativity treats spacetime as dynamical and exhibits its breakdown at singularities‎. ‎This failure is interpreted as evidence that quantum gravity is not a theory formulated {within} spacetime; instead‎, ‎it must explain the very {emergence} of spacetime from deeper quantum degrees of...
How would one build mathematically an infinite number of spatial dimensions theory? I can concieve mathematically an n-th vector or ##\mathbb{R}^{\infty}##, I had done so in my Topology course back then. But obviously it's not empirically possible to test. But is a theory of everything ought to be "finite" and empirical? I mean obviously if there are only 4 interactions (currently known); but then again there could be more interactions around the corner. So to encompass it all seems to me...