A Questions about magnetic monopoles

phoenix95
Gold Member
Messages
81
Reaction score
23
So far as I know there are no monopoles in the electro-weak sector of standard model. So people look for it in the GUT and SUSY sectors. However, they are predicted to be heavy(order of Planck mass). There have been studies from LHC attempting to detect monopoles. So here are my questions:

1. If monopoles are too heavy to be detected at LHC, then why look for them? Are there theories why predict them to be lighter than GUTs? Or am I missing anything?
2. Why all cosmology theories only talk about monopoles of GUTs? One can construct monopoles from SU(3) of strong interaction and/or flavor as well, can't they?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Should experimenters only look for things predicted by theory? We would never have discovered the muon that way.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke, Paul Colby and phoenix95
I think I figured out the answers to my question:

phoenix95 said:
2. Why all cosmology theories only talk about monopoles of GUTs? One can construct monopoles from SU(3) of strong interaction and/or flavor as well, can't they?
SU(3) of the color, doesn't intrinsically carry an electromagnetic charge. Or to put it more appropriately: The electromagnetic charge is constructed from flavor generators of SU(3) and not color. But the flavor symmetry is explicitly broken. Hence there are no monopoles in SU(3) (flavor or color).

phoenix95 said:
1. If monopoles are too heavy to be detected at LHC, then why look for them? Are there theories why predict them to be lighter than GUTs? Or am I missing anything?
Well, if they do then it corresponds to a gauge group that has a weaker coupling compared to GUTs. It can also be viewed like this: GUTs simply present a falsifiable argument saying "Monopoles cannot be detected at present scales available", and the experiments are simply testing that.

I hope someone can correct me if I am wrong in any of the above.

Vanadium 50 said:
Should experimenters only look for things predicted by theory? We would never have discovered the muon that way.
I absolutely agree. Experimenters should be the impudent brats as they are since otherwise theorists can only be writing fantasies.
 
GUT theories predict that monopoles are created at high energies (but not as high as Planck energy) at an early cosmological era. If so, they should be still visible in the present Universe (unless inflation diluted them).
 
  • Like
Likes phoenix95
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...
Back
Top