Questions about matter/antimatter collisions

  • Thread starter Thread starter economancer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collisions
economancer
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
These may seem like silly questions, but seeing as I'm not a physics major (I teach myself about what interests me in any subject really), I could use some clarification on the issue.

Does an anti-particle annihilate only when it meets its "regular matter" particle counterpart, or will the destruction occur when any antimatter particle meets any matter particle? Further, what is the cause of/mechanism for this annihilation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Every particle is indistinguishable from other particles of the same type. One electron is exactly the same as another electron in the same states. As such, an antimatter particle will annihilate with anything that is it's anti-particle. Positrons will annihilate with any electron. Many times an particle doesn't even have a corresponding antiparticle when it is created.
 
Economancer

well, let's start with the easier part your question. A true elementary particle will 'annihilate' with its antiparticle in the sense particle plus antiparticle goes to pure em radiation (ie gamma rays) BUT with two important caveats

Firstly most particles are not elementary so for instance a proton is more complex since it is made of 3 quarks so it can do a whole lot more than just produce pure em radiation.

Secondly give a particle (or antiparticle) enough energy and it can interact in any way that satisfies all the conservation laws (charge, spin etc etc)

Now for the second part of the question – Why do elementary antiparticles and particles annihilate?

This can be answered at all levels of complexity but my favourite is a quote from the late great Richard Feynman “anything which can happen will happen”.

So they annihilate because they can ! (ie they satisfy all the conservation laws)

A more sophisticated argument would talk about the probability of the annihilation in terms of the 'volume' the phase space for the products of the event but without a whole truck load of quantum field theory that's as far as we can go.

Hope this helps

Regards

Sam
 
So its more complicated than simply antimatter *will* annihilate with matter. I'm reading a book (Antimatter by Frank Close) and either I missed it, haven't gotten there yet, or it just doesn't go into that kind of detail. Thanks, I'm sure I'll be back with more questions eventually.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top