Questions About Space: Is Travel Circular? Can You Reach Big Bang Light?

  • Thread starter Thread starter _Mayday_
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Traveling in space may not lead you back to your starting point, as current understanding suggests the universe has a flat geometry without non-trivial topology. The concept of returning to a starting point is tied to the universe's topology, which is still under investigation. Regarding the light from the Big Bang, it is not necessary to travel to reach it, as the cosmic microwave background radiation (CMB) is already observable from Earth. The CMB represents a snapshot of the universe shortly after the Big Bang, rather than a point in space you can reach. Overall, both ideas raise intriguing questions about the nature of the universe and our understanding of cosmology.
_Mayday_
Messages
808
Reaction score
0
Two questions to be precise, I've heard both ideas but neither from a reliable source. The ideas are put quite simply, and any further explanation would be much appreciated.

Firstly: I've heard that if you continue to travel into space, you will eventually land up where you started, much like on this earth.

Secondly: If you traveled far enough and fast enough into space, in theory could you eventually reach the light emitted fromt the big bang? So as light was released from the big bang in traveled into space, and is still traveling now.

Both of these ideas sound like cool thoughts, but I'm not sure if they are correct. I know the second one is possibly irrelevant as we would never be able to catch the light up, but possibly an interesting concept.

Thanks :smile:
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
CrawfordK said:
Secondly: If you traveled far enough and fast enough into space, in theory could you eventually reach the light emitted fromt the big bang?
My non-physicist understanding is that we can see the radiation emitted within a short time period of the Big Bang. You don't need to travel to see it, it comes to you.
 
EnumaElish said:
My non-physicist understanding is that we can see the radiation emitted within a short time period of the Big Bang. You don't need to travel to see it, it comes to you.

That's awesome, I'm trying to find a source, where I can get some more information.
 
Does nobody have an answer? Or possible explanation?
 
Your first question has to do with the topology of the universe. At the moment the universe is thought to be very close to flat geometry and all observations indicate there is no non-trivial topology. If a non-trivial topology were to be discovered it would conflict with standard inflationary cosmology models.

I think that your second question is assuming that somewhere in the universe there is a point where the big bang happened. This isn't really the case. Enuma Elish is referring to the CMB which is a snapshot of the universe as it was approx 400 000 years after the big bang.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top