Quick question about solving an eigenvalue problem

Hakkinen
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I just have a question about the problem for when the eigenvalue = 0

Homework Statement


for y_{xx}=-\lambda y with BC y(0)=0 , y'(0)=y'(1)



Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


y for lamda = 0 is ax+b
so from BC:
y(0)=b=0

and a=a

What is the conclusion to make from this? lamda = 0 and the eigenfunction is constant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hakkinen said:
I just have a question about the problem for when the eigenvalue = 0

Homework Statement


for y_{xx}=-\lambda y with BC y(0)=0 , y'(0)=y'(1)



Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


y for lamda = 0 is ax+b
so from BC:
y(0)=b=0

and a=a

What is the conclusion to make from this? lamda = 0 and the eigenfunction is constant?

I think the conclusion is just that y(x)=ax. That doesn't make it constant.
 
Dick said:
I think the conclusion is just that y(x)=ax. That doesn't make it constant.

Thanks for the reply. So the eigenvalue is 0 and the eigenfunction is just ax, with a determined by some IV?
 
Hakkinen said:
Thanks for the reply. So the eigenvalue is 0 and the eigenfunction is just ax, with a determined by some IV?

Well, you don't conclude that the eigenvalue is 0, you were given that, right? And, yes, you can conclude that y(x)=ax. You can't determine a from the conditions you are given. Another IV would do it.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top