Quick question i'm having touble with

  • Thread starter Thread starter flawlessbrown
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving two blocks and tension. The user is struggling to find the tension (T) without first determining the acceleration (a), questioning whether it’s possible to calculate T directly. It is clarified that the coefficient of friction applies only to the right block, which influences the calculations. The user acknowledges understanding how to find T after determining a but seeks alternative methods to find T independently. The conversation emphasizes the interconnectedness of tension and acceleration in the context of the problem.
flawlessbrown
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Bv4kd.png




Homework Equations



refer to 1.

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer is 9.1 I've done everything from adding the two equations, to plugging in values I am completely stuck. I can find the tension if i solve for acceleration first. But without knowing the acceleration how do you find tension?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't the acceleration the same for both blocks, so by rearranging the equations to eliminate a you could find T?

Also, is the coefficient of friction intentionally only to be applied to the block on the right?
 
Rooted said:
Isn't the acceleration the same for both blocks, so by rearranging the equations to eliminate a you could find T?

Also, is the coefficient of friction intentionally only to be applied to the block on the right?

yes i should've mentioned that

The coefficient only applies to the right block.

Well i know how to do find T if i find a first. But i was wondering if there was a way to find T before finding a.
 
Last edited:
flawlessbrown said:
...

Well i know how to do find T if i find a first. But i was wondering if there was a way to find T before finding a.
Show us the major steps you took to do that: 'find a first'.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top