Quick question of polynomial function

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the leading coefficient of a polynomial function given specific roots and a y-intercept. It clarifies that the equation should be structured as y = A(x+2)^3(x-3)^2, where A is adjusted to ensure the function meets the y-intercept requirement. Confusion arises around the role of the y-intercept in the equation, with participants debating whether to include it in the polynomial form. Additionally, there is a discussion about the reflection of graphs, specifically addressing the transformation of the expression (1-x)^4 and its implications for graph behavior. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying polynomial properties to find coefficients and understand graph transformations.
Nelo
Messages
215
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Determien an euation for each polynomial function described below state whether the function is even, odd or neither. Sketch a graph of each.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



My question is.. If youre given information like this ::

a) A quintic function with zeroes at -2(o3) and 3(o2) and that has a y intercept at 70.

From this statement, are you able to determine the value of the leading coefficiant ( ALWAYS?)

So a) would be.. y = (x+2)^3 (x-3)^2 + 70

If i set X = 0, then y= (0+2)^3 (0-3)^2 + 70

Which gives me (2)^3 * (-3)^2 which is 72.

Do i then do the y intercept value over the value of setting the f(0) ?

Like The leading coefficiant for this one would be 70/72(x+2)^3(x-3)^2 + 70

Is that correct?

Plz answer!

In the back of the book the "+70" is gone.. So that represents a vertical stretch of that value instead of the y intercept? I am confused. Why is that the coefficiant
 
Physics news on Phys.org
y = (x+2)^3 (x-3)^2 + 70 doesn't have zeros at x=(-2) or x=3. Does it? Get rid of the 70 and do it again. You've got the leading coefficient right.
 
What do you mean..? It says in the question "With a y intercept of 70" , why don't that work..? i get rid of the 70 and do wat? , i got that leading coefficiant by dividing 70 by the value of plugging in 0 into x. How else can i do it?
 
Nelo said:
What do you mean..? It says in the question "With a y intercept of 70" , why don't that work..? i get rid of the 70 and do wat? , i got that leading coefficiant by dividing 70 by the value of plugging in 0 into x. How else can i do it?

I mean if you put x=(-2) or x=3 into y = (x+2)^3 (x-3)^2 + 70 you don't get zero for y. They aren't roots. Just start with y = A (x+2)^3 (x-3)^2 and determine A so you get y=70 at x=0.
 
ohh okay, and i do that anytime i get a Y intercept value but no leading coefficiant value right?

So if it told me y int was -14 then y = (x+2)^3 (x-3)^2 -14

y = a(0+2)^3 (0-3)^2 -14

Then solve that, and it becomes a part of a, move one to the other side and divide, right?

Does the -14 join with the a?

Like.. 0= 72a -14 14 = 72a 14/72 . ?
 
Nelo said:
ohh okay, and i do that anytime i get a Y intercept value but no leading coefficiant value right?

So if it told me y int was -14 then y = (x+2)^3 (x-3)^2 -14

y = a(0+2)^3 (0-3)^2 -14

Then solve that, and it becomes a part of a, move one to the other side and divide, right?

Does the -14 join with the a?

Like.. 0= 72a -14 14 = 72a 14/72 . ?

There is NO REASON to put the -14 into y = (x+2)^3 (x-3)^2 -14 to begin with. I don't know why you are doing it. It makes the y value at x=(-2) and x=3 equal to -14, not the value at x=0, y=-14. The only part of y = (x+2)^3 (x-3)^2 you can adjust and still keep the roots is the leading coefficient.
 
ok... but the value of the y intercept(when stated) divided by the value of setting f(0) gives me the leading coefficiant right?
 
Another question.. If i have a grah like (1-x)^4 , then i can remove the x..

[-(x-1)]^4

Does that mean its a reflection on the y axis? Why does the graph still go from q2 to q1 with a upward opening.. It doesn't even reflect. Or am i jus removing a negetive to simplify it, so it doesn't mean y-axis reflection?

-x+1
 
Nelo said:
Another question.. If i have a grah like (1-x)^4 , then i can remove the x..

[-(x-1)]^4

Does that mean its a reflection on the y axis? Why does the graph still go from q2 to q1 with a upward opening.. It doesn't even reflect. Or am i jus removing a negetive to simplify it, so it doesn't mean y-axis reflection?

-x+1
(1 - x)4 = (-(1 - x))4 = (x - 1)4, for all real x. Note that 1 - x \neq, because these quanties have opposite signs.

The graph of y = (1 - x)4 is its own reflection across the vertical line x = 1, but not across the y-axis (the line x = 0).
 
Back
Top