Quick Question on Frequency (just a theoretical question)

AI Thread Summary
Gravitational acceleration does not significantly affect the frequency of a standing wave, as the frequency of sound waves is primarily determined by factors such as density and pressure. While gravity influences the speed of waves, it does not alter the fundamental properties that dictate frequency, such as temperature and gas composition. On the moon, if conditions like temperature and air composition are kept constant, the frequency of a standing wave would remain unchanged despite lower gravity. The discussion emphasizes that the question is more empirical than theoretical, focusing on practical conditions rather than gravitational effects. Therefore, the frequency of a standing wave should not vary significantly in different gravitational environments.
sugarntwiligh
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Does gravitational acceleration have any effect on the frequency of a standing wave? I suppose it does-it probably affects the speed of the wave by hindering wavelength. So, if we went to the moon, and the gravity was considerably less on Earth, would the frequency of a standing wave be greater since the wavelength is smaller? I don't know, does this make sense? Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What kind of standing wave? Light? Sound? A set of springs?
 
Sound
 
The frequency of a sound wave is determined by density and pressure. Usually, one does not factor in gravitational effects ... I.e., the weight of, say, the air in a container, doesn't factor into the calculation in opposition to the density that is already considered, and the density shouldn't change, unless you are allowing your container to expand. I think this is actually a much more empirical question than theoretical question.
 
The speed of sound in a gas is generally affected by the heat capacity ratio of the gas, the temperature and the its molar mass, none of which is related to the gravitational acceleration. Hence, the frequency of a standing wave should not change if the experiment is carried out on the moon (assuming that you conduct it in Earth-like conditions, i.e. same ambient temperature, same air composition)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top