Quick question re. 1dB compression of an RF mixer

  • Thread starter Thread starter wheels1888
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compression Rf
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the 1 dB compression point of an RF mixer, specifically how to convert the output compression point to the input compression point. The user initially finds the specifications intimidating but learns that to find the input 1 dB compression point, the conversion gain must be subtracted from the output compression value. A specific example is provided where the output compression is 19 dBm and the conversion gain is 27 dB, leading to a calculated input compression of -8 dBm. However, confusion arises regarding the correct calculation, with clarification needed on the relationship between output and input compression points. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting mixer specifications for effective use.
wheels1888
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I am quite inexperienced with actually using mixers, so when I was bombarded with specifications by a data sheet I was a bit intimidated at first. I think I have learned what most of the metrics mean thanks to a great deal of resources available online. I just have one question.

The data sheet for the mixer I am going to use lists the 1 dB compression as "1 dB Compression (Output)". Most everywhere else I see it as defined with regards to the RF input. To convert back from this "output compression" (if I am understanding this correctly) do I need to simply subtract the conversion gain from the compression point?

If I am leaving out information please let me know. Also, if you would like to take a look at the data sheet, here it is: http://www.hittite.com/content/documents/data_sheet/hmc621lp4.pdf
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think so if I understand what you mean. Like if you have a gain of +10, if your input is 0.5V, your output read 5V. If you increase the input to 1V and you observe the output is only 9V. So you loss 10% of the signal. from my memory, 1dB compression is about loss of 10%. So 1V is your "input 1dB compression point". You can work back from the output to the input. Say if the output 1dB compression is at 0dBm, and if the conversion gain is 6dB, then your input 1dB compression point should be -6dBm.

That is from my memory, verify this. Numbers might be wrong, the idea should be correct.
 
yungman said:
I think so if I understand what you mean. Like if you have a gain of +10, if your input is 0.5V, your output read 5V. If you increase the input to 1V and you observe the output is only 9V. So you loss 10% of the signal. from my memory, 1dB compression is about loss of 10%. So 1V is your "input 1dB compression point". You can work back from the output to the input. Say if the output 1dB compression is at 0dBm, and if the conversion gain is 6dB, then your input 1dB compression point should be -6dBm.

That is from my memory, verify this. Numbers might be wrong, the idea should be correct.

Yes that is exactly my logic. Thanks for the input! So, in the case of the mixer I am using where,

1 dB compression (output) = 19 dBm
Conversion gain = 27 dB

Then,

1 dB compression (input) = 19 dBm - 27 dB = -8 dBm

Does this seem correct? The LO drive is designed to range from -3 to 3 dBm, so the difference between it and the 1 dB compression seem reasonable, at least from what I've read.
 
Wait, if the output compression point is 19dBm, conversion gain is 27dB, then the input 1db compression should be 19+1-27=-7dBm. Remember the output is 1dB compression, so ideally the output should be 20dBm if there is no compression. Now you got me confused!

I don't follow your LO part.
 
Last edited:
Oh, right! Sorry, you are definitely correct. I'm mixing up the output and input compressions... Ugh. I think why it was defined as such is because there are a few integrated amplifiers in the mixer.

Haha, and don't worry! From what I've read there is a "typical" value for the difference between LO drive and input compression. I was just using this difference to rationalize the value of input compression.

Thanks so much for all the help though!
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top