Quiscent voltage as mention in my hall sensor

  • Thread starter Thread starter proing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sensor Voltage
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on issues with a hall sensor that is not responding linearly to changes in magnetic field strength, displaying only high or low values instead. The sensor's quiescent voltage is expected to be 2.5V but is currently reading 0.7V, which may indicate improper biasing. Suggestions include testing with a non-rare Earth magnet, as the current magnet may be saturating the sensor. Proper biasing is emphasized as a crucial step to resolve the voltage issue. Addressing these problems is essential for achieving accurate sensor readings.
proing
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I am using this hall sensor http://docs-europe.electrocomponents.com/webdocs/0d88/0900766b80d88153.pdf

i got 2 problems:

1. When i vary the magnetic field, the hall sensor is acting like digital, i mean, it showing either high value or low value... Its not varying linearly as the distance between the magnet and sensor varies.

2. The quiscent voltage of this sensor is 2.5V (that is, the hall voltage must be 2.5V without the magnetic field), but it showing 0.7V.

I am playing with this voltage only, when i bring the north pole of the magnet near to the sensor, the reading is 0.1V and moves away it showing 0.7V (like digital)

Please help me out..

Thanq
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
1. You may be saturating the sensor. The range of B fields over which it is linear is small (or smaller than the magnet you are using). A rare Earth magnet can be as high as 10,000 gauss. The transfer ratio is 2.5 mV- 5 mV /G. Try using an Alnico or similar non-rare Earth magnet to test it. However...

2. This may be part of the problem - solve it first because you may not be biasing the device properly in the first place.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top