Quotient criteria and the harmonic series

foges
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Ok so you can't apply the quotient criteria to the harmonic series because:

lim_{k\to \infty}|\dfrac{a_{k+1}}{a_k}|

applied to the harmonic series:

lim_{k\to \infty}|\dfrac{1/(k+1)}{1/k}| = lim_{k\to \infty}|\dfrac{k}{k+1}| < 1
which does fullfill the quotient criteria, yet the harmonic series diverges...

So where else does it not work?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
foges said:
Ok so you can't apply the quotient criteria to the harmonic series because:

lim_{k\to \infty}|\dfrac{a_{k+1}}{a_k}|

applied to the harmonic series:

lim_{k\to \infty}|\dfrac{1/(k+1)}{1/k}| = lim_{k\to \infty}|\dfrac{k}{k+1}| < 1
which does fullfill the quotient criteria, yet the harmonic series diverges...
? No!
\lim_{k\to\infty}|\frac{k}{k+1}|= 1!

It does NOT "fulfill the quotient criteria".

So where else does it not work?
 
ok, so its the fact that it converges to 1 which makes it not work?
 
What exactly do you think the ratio test says?

It looks to me like it does exactly what it claims to do!
 
The fact that the ratio test gives 1 is an inconclusive result - it does not tell us it converges or diverges. More is needed to show this series diverges.
 
If you are looking to establish the divergence of the harmonic series try using the integral test.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top