R-L Circuit, Finding the current through a circuit element.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the current through a 20Ω resistor and a battery in an R-L circuit after the switch has been closed for a long time. It is established that after a long duration, the inductor's voltage is zero, leading to a current of 3A through the 10Ω resistor and the battery. However, the current through the 20Ω resistor is determined to be zero because it is in parallel with the inductor, which also has zero voltage. The reasoning highlights that if the inductor is replaced with a wire, the current through the 20Ω resistor would still be zero, emphasizing the role of the inductor in maintaining this condition. This understanding clarifies the behavior of the circuit elements over time.
hyddro
Messages
73
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


So I am having a hard time trying figuring this out. The question asks for the current through the 20Ω resistor as well as the current through the battery AFTER THE SWITCH HAS BEEN CLOSE FOR ALONG TIME.

Here is a picture of the circuit.

http://i.imgur.com/VjoFSUd.jpg

Homework Equations



Kirchhoff Loop rule.
Kirchhoff node rule.

V_L = L*di/dt

V=iR.

i = I (e^(-t(R/L)))

The Attempt at a Solution



Here is how I tried figuring it out. After a long time di/dt =0 so the potential across the inductor is 0. If that is the case then by Kirchhoff Loop rule (outer loop) E - 10Ω*I - V_L = 0 or 30 - 10Ω*I - V_L = 0
since V_L = 0, then the current through the resistor (and the battery) would be 3A. Now, when I appply the loop rule on the right loop. V_L - 20Ω(I) = 0. Again, Since V_L = 0 then the current through the 20Ω resistor must be zero, but this doesn't make any sense to me, i just don't know why but I feel this is wrong. Can anyone confirm this? Also, if this is right, why is the current through that resistor 0 ? Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hyddro said:

Homework Statement


So I am having a hard time trying figuring this out. The question asks for the current through the 20Ω resistor as well as the current through the battery AFTER THE SWITCH HAS BEEN CLOSE FOR ALONG TIME.

Here is a picture of the circuit.

http://i.imgur.com/VjoFSUd.jpg

Homework Equations



Kirchhoff Loop rule.
Kirchhoff node rule.

V_L = L*di/dt

V=iR.

i = I (e^(-t(R/L)))

The Attempt at a Solution



Here is how I tried figuring it out. After a long time di/dt =0 so the potential across the inductor is 0. If that is the case then by Kirchhoff Loop rule (outer loop) E - 10Ω*I - V_L = 0 or 30 - 10Ω*I - V_L = 0
since V_L = 0, then the current through the resistor (and the battery) would be 3A. Now, when I appply the loop rule on the right loop. V_L - 20Ω(I) = 0. Again, Since V_L = 0 then the current through the 20Ω resistor must be zero, but this doesn't make any sense to me, i just don't know why but I feel this is wrong. Can anyone confirm this? Also, if this is right, why is the current through that resistor 0 ? Thank you

You just figured out that the voltage across the inductor is zero, and the 20 ohm is across the inductor also. So what would be the voltage across the 20 ohm resistor? the current?
 
Oh Yeah! They are connected in parallel, so the Potential across the inductor must be equal to the potential across the 20 ohm resistor, if that is the case then the potential across the resistor is 0, from Ohm's law, 0=I.R, so I must be zero as well... Is this correct? Why is the current 0? I mean mathematically this makes sense, but in terms of the role of an inductor in a circut, why is this happening? What happens if we replace this inductor with a piece of wire and close the switch? would this scenario still happen? Thank you!
 
Well, why shouldn't the current thru the 20 ohm be zero?

If you let current in an iinductor settle at a constant value - any constant vaue including zero - then the voltage across that inductor is zero.

If you replaced the inductor with a wire then obviously the current thru the 20 ohm would always be zero.

Ashort wire is an inductor with a very low inductance (a few nanohenries typically).
 
ok that was really helpful. Thank you Rude man! hehe
 
Edit...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top