R or bayes for independent study?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on an undergraduate student in statistics weighing the benefits of taking a course in R versus a course in Bayesian statistics for their upcoming independent study. The student expresses a preference for Bayesian methods, feeling confident in their ability to learn R as needed, especially since they plan to pursue graduate studies where both skills will be valuable. A key consideration is the presence of a peer who requires a programming course to graduate, which complicates the decision since she prefers R. Respondents emphasize the advantages of studying Bayesian statistics, noting that R is user-friendly for those with some programming background. They suggest that learning R concurrently with Bayesian methods is feasible and beneficial, especially with resources like Kruschke's book available for reference. The consensus leans towards prioritizing the Bayesian course while also acknowledging the ease of picking up R.
bennyska
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
i'm an undergrad in stats, and next semester is my last. I'm doing an independent study next semester, and am unsure of what would be more beneficial for me: a class in R, or bayes. i would like to do bayes, and I'm decent on computers with limited programming experience, so I'm not too worried about picking up R as i go along, but that's based on zero experience with R. i will be doing grad school, and i figure i'll get experience with both of these there, so either one would work. there are a few books that combine the two, like kruschle's book, that i could do.
really the issue is there is someone else i'll be doing an independent study with, and she is not only NOT super hot with computers, she also needs a programming course to graduate, so she wants to do R. if we go through the same teacher, we'd have to do one together, but we could possibly go through different teachers.

anyway, anyone have an opinion?
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You mean bayesian statistics? If you have an opportunity to study bayesian methods, I would strongly recommend that you take advantage of it. R is a very high-level programming language; it will be very easy for you to get the hang of it by creating a few mock data sets and playing around with it.
 
I recommend you do the Bayesian course, especially if you use WinBUGS. My Bayesian course used R and WinBUGS in addition to Bayesian theory so it was good for me.

If you have done any kind of procedural programming before, R is not hard to learn.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
102
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top