R3: U & Uperpendicular Vector Logic

  • Thread starter Thread starter sjeddie
  • Start date Start date
sjeddie
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Let's say we are in R3, and U is the x,z plane, i think then all of Uperpendicular should be some translation of the span of the y axis. Now, since that U and Uperpendicular together form R3, then isn't it true that all vectors in R3 should be contained in either U or Uperpendicular? But given a vector, say (1,1,2), it is in neither U nor Uperpendicular. What's wrong with my logic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have confused union with direct sum. What you have said is that \mathbb{R}^3 = U \cup U^\perp, which is not true, as you have noted. The correct statement is that \mathbb{R}^3 = U \oplus U^\perp Note that the direct sum in this case can be defined as A \oplus B = \{ a + b | a \in A, b \in B \}. Try to show that every element of \mathbb{R}^3 may be written as a sum of an element in U and an element in U^\perp. The decomposition for your specific vector is (1,1,2) = (1,0,2) + (0,1,0).
 
I get it. (x,y,z)=(a,0,c) + (0,b,0) where (a,0,c) is in U and (0,b,0) is in Uperp. I didn't know what direct sum is, now I do! Thanks a lot rochfor1, you're awesome :)
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
447
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top