R3: U & Uperpendicular Vector Logic

  • Thread starter Thread starter sjeddie
  • Start date Start date
sjeddie
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Let's say we are in R3, and U is the x,z plane, i think then all of Uperpendicular should be some translation of the span of the y axis. Now, since that U and Uperpendicular together form R3, then isn't it true that all vectors in R3 should be contained in either U or Uperpendicular? But given a vector, say (1,1,2), it is in neither U nor Uperpendicular. What's wrong with my logic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have confused union with direct sum. What you have said is that \mathbb{R}^3 = U \cup U^\perp, which is not true, as you have noted. The correct statement is that \mathbb{R}^3 = U \oplus U^\perp Note that the direct sum in this case can be defined as A \oplus B = \{ a + b | a \in A, b \in B \}. Try to show that every element of \mathbb{R}^3 may be written as a sum of an element in U and an element in U^\perp. The decomposition for your specific vector is (1,1,2) = (1,0,2) + (0,1,0).
 
I get it. (x,y,z)=(a,0,c) + (0,b,0) where (a,0,c) is in U and (0,b,0) is in Uperp. I didn't know what direct sum is, now I do! Thanks a lot rochfor1, you're awesome :)
 
Thread 'Derivation of equations of stress tensor transformation'
Hello ! I derived equations of stress tensor 2D transformation. Some details: I have plane ABCD in two cases (see top on the pic) and I know tensor components for case 1 only. Only plane ABCD rotate in two cases (top of the picture) but not coordinate system. Coordinate system rotates only on the bottom of picture. I want to obtain expression that connects tensor for case 1 and tensor for case 2. My attempt: Are these equations correct? Is there more easier expression for stress tensor...

Similar threads

Back
Top