What was Maggie's acceleration in a 100m race with a dead heat finish?

In summary: I don't know how to graph this. Ok so I know that1. Time taken by both to reach the finish line = 10.2 seconds (since this is a dead heat)2. Distance covered by both in 10.2 seconds = 100m3. Suppose Vm and Vj are the speeds of Maggie and Judy at any time t, then Vm is maximum at 2.10s and Vj is maximum for 3.10s.Now draw a graph of Vm versus t and Vj versus t. Find the maximum speed of both Maggie and Judy (given the initial speed = 0 m/s). After t = Tmax--different for Maggie and Judy--the speeds are constant
  • #1
Freeze
9
0
Ok this is another problem I am having trouble with.

In a 100 m race, Maggie and Judy cross the finish line in a dead heat, both taking 10.2 s. Accelerating uniformly, Maggie took 2.10 s and Judy 3.10 s to attain maximum speed, which they maintained for the rest of the race. What was Maggie's acceleration?

Ok so I know that

Si (initial distance)= 0 m
Sf (final distance)= 100m
Delta T = 10.2s (10-0)

Vi( Initial velocity of maggy and Judy) = 0 m/s

I think Judy's time is there just to distract us, because every time I try to use both set of data and plug them into a kinematic equations for motion with constant acceleration, I reach a dead end.

So I tried a different method

100m - Sf = 1/2 * a * (2.10s) ^ 2

100m - Sf = 2.205A

A = (100m-Sf)/2.205

And Then I tried to plug that back into the SF equatoin but that didn't help.


Can anyone point me to the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
In a 100 m race, Maggie and Judy cross the finish line in a dead heat, both taking 10.2 s. Accelerating uniformly, Maggie took 2.10 s and Judy 3.10 s to attain maximum speed, which they maintained for the rest of the race. What was Maggie's acceleration?

Since the acceleration isn't constant throughout the race, you can't simply use 1/2a*t^2.

So maggie's position would be something like this:

1/2a*(2.1)^2 + vf(10.2-2.1) = 100m

You can find vf by saying vf = a*t where t is how much time she spent accelerating. I hope I didn't give away too much!
 
  • #3
Freeze said:
Ok this is another problem I am having trouble with.

In a 100 m race, Maggie and Judy cross the finish line in a dead heat, both taking 10.2 s. Accelerating uniformly, Maggie took 2.10 s and Judy 3.10 s to attain maximum speed, which they maintained for the rest of the race. What was Maggie's acceleration?

So you have

1. Time taken by both to reach the finish line = 10.2 seconds (since this is a dead heat)
2. Distance covered by both in 10.2 seconds = 100m
3. Suppose Vm and Vj are the speeds of Maggie and Judy at any time t, then Vm is maximum at 2.10s and Vj is maximum for 3.10s.

Now draw a graph of Vm versus t and Vj versus t. Find the maximum speed of both Maggie and Judy (given the initial speed = 0 m/s). After t = Tmax--different for Maggie and Judy--the speeds are constant and equal to their respective values at 2.10s and 3.10s. Does that give you some idea how to draw the graph? (If not, the v-t graph has a linearly increasing section followed by a line parallel to the time axis).

Ok so I know that

Si (initial distance)= 0 m
Sf (final distance)= 100m
Delta T = 10.2s (10-0)

Vi( Initial velocity of maggy and Judy) = 0 m/s
Okay up to here.

I think Judy's time is there just to distract us, because every time I try to use both set of data and plug them into a kinematic equations for motion with constant acceleration, I reach a dead end.
Thats probably because your analysis isn't quite right. And you get equations which aren't too friendly either.

So I tried a different method

100m - Sf = 1/2 * a * (2.10s) ^ 2

100m - Sf = 2.205A

A = (100m-Sf)/2.205

I don't see what you are doing. Sf has a different meaning here does it? Otherwise, from what you wrote above, 100m = Sf and so each of these equations makes no sense.

And Then I tried to plug that back into the SF equatoin but that didn't help.

Can anyone point me to the right direction?

Well I think you should graphically do this first, because the solution isn't very difficult and can be done in more than one way. You need two equations for the two accelerations, given the above conditions. Try and rework this after making the graph and follow up with your solution.

Cheers
Vivek
 
  • #4
I thought you were saying Sf = 100 m ?

Anyway, like you said, forget about judy.

Split the sprint into two sections : (1) the acceleration , (2) the cruise

What do you know about section (1) ? The time taken, t = 2.1 s. Call the distance s, the acceleration a, and the final velocity v. What equations can you write relating these quantities.

Now for section (2), the distance run is 100 - s, and is run at constant velocity v(accel = 0). You alsko know the time taken for this stretch. Can you not relate 100 - s to v and the time ?

You now have 3 equations in 3 unknowns. Solve them.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
Oh sorry with these equations

100m - Sf = 1/2 * a * (2.10s) ^ 2
100m - Sf = 2.205A
A = (100m-Sf)/2.205

I meant Sf = The distance traveled in 2.10 seconds
But I just realized that even if I got the Acceleration from that, It would for after the 2.10 seconds. And I know that anyway. Since after 2.10 seconds they maintained the maximum speed the velocity must be increasing constantly and so the A must be 0.

Ok so that went out the window.

Now the equations that I can relate this three (distance s, the acceleration a, and the final velocity v) are

S = (Vf-vi) * delta t (since vi = 0, it's Vf * delta T )
S = 1/2 a delta t ^ 2
A = Vf * delta T

Now from the info on section 2, now I know that

100 - S = 1/2 a * delta t ^ 2 Or

100 - (vf * delta T) = 1/2 a * delta t ^ 2 or

100 - (Vf (10.2- 2.21) = 1/2 * a * 4.41

100 - (vf (7.99) = 2.205A

100 = 2.205A + Vf(7.99)

100 = 2.205A + A * (2.10) (7.99)

100 = 18.984A

A = 5.27 m/s/s

Yay, Thank you guys for the help.
 

1. What is the "Race Acceleration problem"?

The "Race Acceleration problem" refers to the phenomenon in which certain racial and ethnic groups experience slower rates of social and economic progress compared to others. This can manifest in areas such as education, employment, and wealth accumulation.

2. What causes the "Race Acceleration problem"?

The "Race Acceleration problem" is a complex issue with no single cause. It is the result of systemic and structural inequalities, historical and ongoing discrimination, and various social and economic factors such as access to resources and opportunities.

3. Is the "Race Acceleration problem" a genetic issue?

No, the "Race Acceleration problem" is not a genetic issue. There is no scientific evidence to suggest that certain racial or ethnic groups are genetically predisposed to experience slower progress. Race is a social construct, not a biological one.

4. Can the "Race Acceleration problem" be solved?

Yes, the "Race Acceleration problem" can be addressed and mitigated through various means such as policies and programs aimed at promoting equality and addressing systemic inequalities. It also requires active efforts to combat discrimination and promote inclusivity.

5. What is the role of scientists in addressing the "Race Acceleration problem"?

Scientists have an important role to play in addressing the "Race Acceleration problem" by conducting research to better understand the underlying causes and consequences, and by advocating for evidence-based policies and solutions to promote racial equity and justice.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
11K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top