Radar Camera for Large Format Photography

AI Thread Summary
Creating a radar camera for large format photography poses significant challenges due to the vast difference in wavelengths between radar and visible light. Radar wavelengths, ranging from 1 cm to 1.5 m, require a camera size approximately 1 billion times larger than traditional light cameras. While it is theoretically possible to design a lower resolution radar camera, the practicality and feasibility of such a project are questionable. Using a 40-meter CW transmitter and receiver could allow for a narrow panoramic strip, but the limitations of radar imaging must be considered. Overall, the concept is intriguing but may not be viable for high-resolution applications.
Mustafa Umut
Messages
31
Reaction score
1
Large Format Photograph Machines usually uses 8x10 inches size negative. Can I make a radar large format camera with using similar or bigger size plate as antenna and when transmitter was a cw radio transmitter ? I know only need of mixing transmitted to received.

If this does not work , can I use a 40 meter cw transmitter and receiver when antenna layed horizontal and take a narrow strip of panaroma.

Is there a chance or is it out of question ?

Thank you ,

Mustafa Umut Sarac

Istanbul
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
No. The wavelength of the radiation determines the size of the aperture and thus the camera. Radar wavelengths range from 1cm to 1.5m. Visible light wavelengths range from 380 to 740 nanometers. So a radar camera would need to be about 1 billion times bigger than a light camera.
 
Note that on the other side of the coin, you could just make a much lower resolution camera and/or image. Radar was used to see through the clouds of Venus and map its surface, for example:

PIA00160_410.jpg


http://sci.esa.int/venus-express/50372-radar-map-of-venus-surface/
The full resolution version of that image has a resolution of about 2 miles per pixel.
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top