Radial component of del^2 in spherical coordinates? (again)

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 4K views
philip041
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a question on a 3D isotropic harmonic oscillator. At one point I need to find write the radial component of del^2.

Lecturer has written

[tex] <br /> \frac{1}{r^{2}} \frac{d}{dr} \left( r^{2} \frac{d}{dr} \right)<br /> [/tex]

where the del^2 used to be in the set of equations.

Am I correct in saying the radial part of in spherical polar coordinates is just dr. Then del^2 would be dr^2? Well I'm not?

I had a look at http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/sphc.html but it didn't explain anything more for me.

PS. I asked this question earlier but internet broke, (thanks virgin media), and I don't understand the answer given... https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=2006618#post2006618
 
Physics news on Phys.org
philip041 said:
I'm doing a question on a 3D isotropic harmonic oscillator. At one point I need to find write the radial component of del^2.

Lecturer has written

[tex] <br /> \frac{1}{r^{2}} \frac{d}{dr} \left( r^{2} \frac{d}{dr} \right)<br /> [/tex]

where the del^2 used to be in the set of equations.

Am I correct in saying the radial part of in spherical polar coordinates is just dr. Then del^2 would be dr^2? Well I'm not?

I had a look at http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/sphc.html but it didn't explain anything more for me.

Hi philip041! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and a phi: φ and a curly d: ∂ :wink:)

isotropic means dθ = dφ = 0

so in http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/sphc.html at http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/lapl.html#c2, the only non-zero terms in the last line are ∂2f/∂r2 + 2/r ∂f/∂r,

which is the same as 1/r2 d/dr(r2d/dr) :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks,

With ∂^2f/∂r^2 + 2/r ∂f/∂r how come it doesn't go to ∂^2/∂r^2 -1/r^2?

Sorry I don't understand how you get to that final line you wrote.
 
product rule

philip041 said:
With ∂^2f/∂r^2 + 2/r ∂f/∂r how come it doesn't go to ∂^2/∂r^2 -1/r^2?

uhhh? how did you get -1/r^2? :confused:

Hint: use the product rule to find d/dr(r2df/dr) :smile:
 
sweet. i also found an explanation of this in zetilli appendix b of quantum mechanics if anyone should ever search for this thread...