Radiation on Mars: Does it Lack a Magnetosphere?

  • Thread starter Thread starter thomshere
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mars Radiation
AI Thread Summary
Mars experiences intense radiation due to its lack of a significant magnetosphere, which is a result of its smaller size and the rapid cooling of its molten iron core. Unlike Earth, Mars lost its planetary dynamo that generates a magnetic field, leading to higher radiation exposure. While concerns about radiation may hinder manned exploration and colonization, current assessments suggest that the levels are overstated and manageable with existing technology. Organizations like MarsOne advocate for manned missions to Mars, emphasizing that risks can be mitigated. Future lunar missions may provide additional insights into radiation risks before any serious attempts at Mars exploration are made.
thomshere
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Some article made mention of intense radiation on Mars. Does that mean Mars lacks a magnetosphere? I figured it would be about like earth, with a molten iron core.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Mars is much smaller than Earth and the heat that kept the core and mantle molten was lost much quicker than here on Earth. As a result, the planetary dynamo that powers Earth's magnetic field died off long ago on Mars.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mars#Internal_structure
 
thomshere said:
Some article made mention of intense radiation on Mars. Does that mean Mars lacks a magnetosphere? I figured it would be about like earth, with a molten iron core.
Did you try Googling "mars magnetosphere"? Or do you want us to Google it for you.
 
If you're wonder and concern about "intense radiation" stems from considering that it might forbid manned exploration or perhaps more importantly, colonization, perhaps you will be glad to know that "intense" is rather overstating the case. Even with present technology it is still possible. Here's a synopsis http://www.mars-one.com/faq/health-and-ethics/how-much-radiation-will-the-settlers-be-exposed-to.

MarsOne has been an ardent supporter of manned exploration of Mars so they do have an agenda, but the math and the standards look good. Also, given the expense and the sheer exposure to chance on a 210 day journey versus one substantially less than a week, it is likely we will revisit our Moon before any real attempt is made on Mars, so we will learn a great deal more of the risks and mitigation by then.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top