Radiation perpendicularly incident to a surface

  • Thread starter Thread starter Demon117
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation Surface
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the elimination of reflected waves from radiation incident perpendicularly on a plane with an index of refraction, n. By introducing a second dielectric layer with an index of \sqrt{n} and a thickness of 1/4 wavelength, constructive interference can be achieved, effectively canceling the reflected wave. The boundary conditions for electric and magnetic fields are established, leading to simultaneous equations that facilitate the analysis of the system. The necessity of the 1/4 wavelength thickness is emphasized to ensure the correct phase shift for interference.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave propagation
  • Familiarity with boundary conditions in optics
  • Knowledge of phase shifts in wave reflections
  • Basic concepts of dielectric materials and their indices of refraction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of interference in wave optics
  • Learn about the derivation of the Fresnel equations for reflection and transmission
  • Explore the applications of anti-reflective coatings in optics
  • Investigate the implications of varying indices of refraction in multilayer systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in optics, physicists studying wave phenomena, and engineers involved in designing optical devices and coatings.

Demon117
Messages
162
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Consider radiation perpendicularly incident to a plane whose index of refraction is n. Show that the reflected wave can be eliminated by covering the plane with a second dielectric layer with index of [itex]\sqrt{n}[/itex] and thickness 1/4 wavelength.


Homework Equations


Boundary conditions: [itex]E_{1}^{||}=E_{2}^{||}[/itex], and [itex]B_{1}^{||}=B_{2}^{||}[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution



Electric and Magnetic field at z=0 can be given by:

[itex]{E_{I}(z,t)=E_{I}exp[i(k_{1}z-\omega t)],E_{R}(z,t)=E_{R}exp[i(-k_{1}z-\omega t)]},{B_{I}(z,t)=\frac{1}{v_{1}}E_{I}exp[i(k_{1}z-\omega t)],B_{R}(z,t)=\frac{1}{v_{1}}E_{R}exp[i(-k_{1}z-\omega t)]}[/itex]

For 0<z<[itex]\frac{\lambda}{4}[/itex]:

[itex]{E_{i}(z,t)=E_{i}exp[i(k_{2}z-\omega t)],E_{r}(z,t)=E_{r}exp[i(-k_{2}z-\omega t)]},{B_{i}(z,t)=\frac{1}{v_{1}}E_{i}exp[i(k_{2}z-\omega t)],B_{r}(z,t)=\frac{1}{v_{1}}E_{r}exp[i(-k_{2}z-\omega t)]}[/itex]

For z>[itex]\frac{\lambda}{4}[/itex]:

[itex]{E_{T}(z,t)=E_{T}exp[i(k_{3}z-\omega t)]},{B_{T}(z,t)=\frac{1}{v_{1}}E_{I}exp[i(k_{3}z-\omega t)]}[/itex]

These boundary conditions allow us to find simultaneous equations for z=0 and z=[itex]\frac{\lambda}{4}[/itex]:

z=0 => [itex]{E_{I}+E_{R}=E_{r}+E_{i}, E_{I}-E_{R}=\beta (E_{r}-E_{i})}[/itex]

z=[itex]\frac{\lambda}{4}[/itex]=> [itex]{E_{r}exp[ik_{2}\frac{\lambda}{4}]+E_{i}exp[-ik_{2}\frac{\lambda}{4}]=E_{T}exp[ik_{3}\frac{\lambda}{4}], E_{r}exp[ik_{2}\frac{\lambda}{4}]-E_{i}exp[-ik_{2}\frac{\lambda}{4}]=\alpha E_{T}exp[ik_{3}\frac{\lambda}{4}]}[/itex]

Here, [itex]\alpha =\frac{v_{2}}{v_{3}}[/itex], [itex]\beta =\frac{v_{1}}{v_{2}}[/itex]

I have done plenty of algebra to find [itex]E_{I}[/itex] in terms of [itex]E_{R}[/itex], but this seems to require more information than I have. I am just not seeing the end from here, does anyone have a suggestion on where to go from this point?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can offer only limited help ! I do not know where √n comes into the full mathematical analysis BUT, at my level, it is easy to show that the film needs to be λ/4 thick.
Here goes: Light from the low n to high n interface undergoes a phase shift of ∏ (λ/2)
Light striking the high n to low n interface does not undergo a phase shift.
In this example BOTH reflections undergo a λ/2 phase shift because both are from low n to high n.
To eliminate the reflected wave needs interference between the 2 reflected waves and the phase shift must be λ/2 (or 3λ/2, 5λ/2 ...etc).
This means that the film must be λ/4 thick ...light travels there and back through the film.
That is the level of my understanding !
Hope it helps
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K