Radio Wave Question: Reception Better for Low or High Frequencies?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fran1942
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radio Wave
AI Thread Summary
Radio reception inside a cage made of 100mm grid wire mesh is expected to be better for high frequencies, such as those used by cellphones. This is because high-frequency signals have shorter wavelengths that can pass through the mesh more effectively, resulting in less interference. In contrast, low frequencies, like 1 MHz, have longer wavelengths that are more likely to be obstructed by the mesh. The consensus in the discussion supports the idea that high frequencies will perform better in this scenario. Overall, the mesh size plays a crucial role in determining signal reception quality based on frequency.
fran1942
Messages
80
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


If we placed a radio receiver inside a cage made of 100mm grid wire mesh, would the radio reception be better for low (eg 1 MHz) or high (eg cellphone) radio frequencies. Explain


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I think the reception would be better for high frequencies because the the corresponding wavelength would be smaller therefore matching the small wire mesh size better and passing though with less interference.

Can someone please confirm if I am on the right track here ?

Thanks kindly for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with your thinking.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top