Radioactive Decay: 56Co to 56Fe - Which Type of Beta Decay?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on identifying the type of beta decay between 56Co and 56Fe, with 56Co decaying into 56Fe. Participants clarify that 56Co has a mass of 55.9399u and 56Fe has a mass of 55.9349u, indicating that 56Co is less stable. The conversation highlights the need to determine which isotope is stable to understand the decay process, specifically whether it involves beta-minus (β-) or beta-plus (β+) decay. There is uncertainty about using the periodic table and half-life data to ascertain stability. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards 56Fe being the more stable element, suggesting that 56Co undergoes beta decay to become 56Fe.
Jules18
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
The problem states:

The mass of 56Co is 55.9399u,
and the mass of 56Fe is 55.9349u.
Which isotope decays into the other and by what process?

I know it's beta decay, but there are two types of beta decay and I'm not sure how to tell which one would happen. If anyone is more familiar with these kinds of questions than I am, I'd be really thankful for any help.

Thanks ahead of time!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, which isotope is the stable one?

Knowing that then, in which direction is the β decay?

Proton to neutron β-

or

neutron to proton β+?

Doesn't the transition tell you?
 
I'm not quite sure what you mean by transition, but the question doesn't say anything about which atom is more stable.

Is it possible to tell from the periodic table?
 
Jules18 said:
I'm not quite sure what you mean by transition, but the question doesn't say anything about which atom is more stable.

Is it possible to tell from the periodic table?

By transition, I was meaning alchemy. One element to another.

The half life is certainly something you can look up I would think.

Without looking, I would intuitively think iron is a more stable element than cobalt. But you should check to be sure.
 
Okay thanks :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top