Radioactive Decay chain and Masses of Products

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the remaining mass of each nuclide in a radioactive decay chain after a specified time, one can use the Bateman equations, which provide a framework for determining the quantities of nuclides based on their half-lives. The formation rate of the final product is influenced primarily by the nuclide with the longest half-life, as it acts as the rate-determining step in the decay process. It is expected that low-half-life nuclides will be nearly depleted before reaching the first long-half-life nuclide, while some quantities of subsequent nuclides will still be present. Additionally, there is a request for assistance with C++ programming related to this topic. Understanding these calculations is crucial for accurately modeling radioactive decay chains.
lapo3399
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Based on a starting isotope, isotope mass, and duration of time, what calculations would be used to find the mass remaining of each individual nuclide in the decay chain after the time period? I think that the rate at which the final product is formed depends most on the nuclide with the highest half-life, as chemical systems in chemistry are reliant on the rate determining step. However, what I find difficult to visualise is how much of the other nuclides would be left. I presume that, depending on the time interval, all the low-half-life nuclides before the first long-half-life nuclide would pretty much be gone, with certain quantities of other nuclides after the long-life nuclide being present. Can someone please elaborate on the calculations necessary?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
have you tried Bateman equations?
 
Thanks, I researched them and they are exactly what I need.
 
lapo3399 said:
Thanks, I researched them and they are exactly what I need.

great, good luck with your task! =)
 

Thread 'The Physics of unloading sand from a barge'

I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Reversibility of radioactive decay process?
Replies
5
Views
2K
B Is Radioactive Decay Truly Random?
Replies
6
Views
2K
B Shorter half-life and therefore very radioactive -- why?
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Twin paradox in SR and its applicability to radioactive decay
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Is there a tie between half life and energy of decay?
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Algorithmic model for primary decay chains
Replies
1
Views
1K
How Can We Measure the Decay Rate of Uranium-238 Given Its Long Half-Life?
Replies
27
Views
5K
I Deciphering Decay Chains: Understanding the Complexity of Radioactive Decay
Replies
7
Views
1K
Understanding radioactivity levels of different isotopes
Replies
14
Views
3K
B Twin Paradox: Radioactive Decay Tested
Replies
15
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top