Radioactive decay (may include math)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the half-life of a substance emitting alpha particles at a known rate. Initially perceived as straightforward, the problem reveals complexities due to the changing decay rate of individual atoms after emitting particles. It highlights that radioactive decay follows a logarithmic pattern rather than a linear one, suggesting the need for calculus to derive the decay formula. However, applying the formula requires only basic algebra, as the decay is exponentially decreasing based on the number of atoms and the decay constant. The conversation concludes that while derivation involves calculus, practical application can be handled with simpler mathematical concepts.
ShawnD
Science Advisor
Messages
715
Reaction score
2
A question was originally put in the homework help forum
"1 gramm radiates 3,7*10^10 alpha-particles in a second. Find out the half-life"

At a glance it looks simple. You start with X number of AMU, it's radiating at a rate of Y, find out how long it takes to get to 0.5X; right? Then I thought about it a second time. Once 1 atom of this substance emits an alpha particle, that atom is no longer the same, so it doesn't have the same rate it had before. This would mean the overall decay rate is constantly changing. If you think back to radioactive decay graphs from school, things do not decay in straight lines. Decay is always, or usually, logarithmic.

This problem was in the easy physics homework section, which would imply no calculus is involved. I can't figure out how this problem can be done without it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it presumed you'll just plug some numbers into some exponential-decay forumula? Otherwise, I think you need basic calculus to derive the result.

Note: once an atom has decayed, it is normally assumed that the product atom has zero significant decay rate.
 
Hey guys it is not too difficult the assumption is that the rate of change in particles number is Proportional to the present number: dN=-NdtY (where Y is the inverse of the half-life time). this ODE is easy too to integrate:

N=NoExp(-tY)

So the decay is alway exponentially decreasing... and it depeds upon two parameters No and Y...

bye Marco
 
If you need to derive the formula, you need calculus. But to use the formula is simple college algebra.
Activity = Number of atoms*Decay Constant (Decay Constant = ln2/Half-life)
Number of atoms in sample = Avogadro's Number*Mass of sample/Gram Atomic Weight
Activity(at time t) = Activity (at time = 0)exp(-decay constant*t)
Specific Activity = Avogadro's Number*Decay Constant/Gram Atomic Weight
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top