Radioactive Decay: P to Q vs. S to R?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the processes of radioactive decay involving nuclei P, Q, R, and S, specifically questioning why the transition from P to Q is favored over S to R. Both processes lead to the formation of more stable nuclei, but P to Q is preferred due to the higher binding energy associated with that transition. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding nuclear binding energy and its relation to stability in determining the likelihood of these reactions. It also raises questions about the nature of radioactive decay and the implications of nucleon changes in these processes. Ultimately, the conclusion is that P to Q is the more probable reaction for achieving stability.
desmond iking
Messages
284
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


the variation of nuclear binding energy per nucelon of nuclei P , Q , R and S are shown.
Which process most likely to occur?

the ans is P to Q ... why not S to R ?

both
P to Q and S to R involve formation of unstable nucleus to more stable nucleus...

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • IMG_20141029_062627[1].jpg
    IMG_20141029_062627[1].jpg
    39.7 KB · Views: 504
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Radioactive decay is the process fission. What will this do with the number of nucleons?
Your answer to this should tell you which way any likely reaction would go, either:
  • S ##\rightarrow## R and Q ##\rightarrow## P.
  • S ##\leftarrow## R and Q ##\leftarrow## P.
2. To achieve a more stable atom, that is a resulting atom with a higher binding energy, which way will the respective reactions go?

As soon as you know the answer to these two conditions, only one possible option will remain :)...

H.
 
Last edited:
To achieve more stable atom either p to q or r to s will occur...
 
Buy why the ans is p to q ?
 
I think you need to read my previous reply a bit more careful ;)..

Both 1. and 2. Has to be fulfilled.. Also, your statement about stability, are both correct? Remember, higher binding energy ##\rightarrow## more stable.
 
Do the problem actually mentions "radioactive decay"?
How is a decay in which the number of nucleons increases?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top