Radioactive Source Emitting Only Alpha and Gamma Radiation

AI Thread Summary
To demonstrate that a radioactive source emits only alpha and gamma radiation, one effective approach is to first confirm the absence of beta radiation using a beta detector. After establishing that beta radiation is not present, the presence of alpha radiation can be shown by measuring the radiation count before and after placing a sheet of paper, which absorbs alpha particles. Gamma radiation can be confirmed by noting that the radiation count remains unchanged when a sheet of aluminum is placed in front of the source, as gamma rays can penetrate aluminum. It is essential to emphasize that both alpha and gamma emissions must be confirmed for the source to meet the criteria outlined in the problem. This methodical approach ensures a comprehensive understanding of the radiation types emitted by the source.
Molly1235
Messages
77
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement

"How could you show that a radioactive source was only emitting alpha and gamma radiation?"The attempt at a solution

This really stumped me...obviously they have different penetration distances, and different strengths of ionisation, but I don't know how to show that only these are being emitted. All I could come up with is using a beta radiation detector to show that beta is not being emitted?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your beta detector can show that there is no beta radiation. But what if your source was just a gamma emitter? Or just an alpha emitter?

The key word in the problem above is, '... emitting alpha AND gamma radiation.', emphasis on the AND.
 
SteamKing said:
Your beta detector can show that there is no beta radiation. But what if your source was just a gamma emitter? Or just an alpha emitter?

The key word in the problem above is, '... emitting alpha AND gamma radiation.', emphasis on the AND.

So would I first demonstrate that there's no beta present, and then say how you can prove alpha is present, and then how to prove gamma is present? Would it be that the radiation count will decrease between being in front of and behind a sheet of paper, showing that alpha radiation has been absorbed, and then that this number wouldn't change behind a sheet of aluminium because gamma would penetrate it?
 
It would be true that you have to show beta radiation is not present, and also that both alpha and gamma radiation must be present. I think on approach is to first consider what exactly alpha and beta radiation is composed of, and then ask what this form of radiation does when a magnetic field is applied to it. Detecting gamma rays is not an easy matter, but there are detectors out there capable of detecting gamma rays.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top