Radius divided or multiplied by refractive index?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics homework problem involving a lamp at the bottom of a lake, with a visible bright circle of radius 10 meters and a refractive index of 1.33. Participants are debating whether to divide or multiply the radius by the refractive index to find the depth of the lamp. Initial calculations suggest that dividing gives a depth of approximately 7.52 meters, while multiplying results in about 13.3 meters. There is uncertainty regarding the interpretation of the problem and whether additional hidden variables are involved. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the principles of refraction and total internal reflection in solving the problem.
Mr. Floyd
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
First of all, sorry for bad english. Second of all sorry if such thread is already created, but I really need fast help.

Homework Statement



There's a lamp in the bottom of the lake. If you watch the lamp from the surface(out of the water) and your eyesight is crossed with the lake, you can see a bright circle. Radius of the circle is 10 meters. Refractive index of the water is 1,33. how deep in the water the lamp is.

Homework Equations



radius divided or multiplied by refractive index? that's the only idea i can come up with.

The Attempt at a Solution



10/1,33=7,52m
10*1,33=13,3m

well the task only has 2 numbers(10 and 1,33), so i think it has to to something with these.
What considers me is that there might be some "hidden numbers" in the text, that i can't read out at the moment.
please read this too:I understand that it very rude to come to this forum like that, and create a thread, what might already have answer, but I really need help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi Mr. Floyd! Welcome to PF! :wink:
Mr. Floyd said:
I understand that it very rude to come to this forum like that, and create a thread, what might already have answer, but I really need help.

No, that's exactly what you're supposed to do! :smile:
There's a lamp in the bottom of the lake. If you watch the lamp from the surface(out of the water) and your eyesight is crossed with the lake, you can see a bright circle. Radius of the circle is 10 meters. Refractive index of the water is 1,33. how deep in the water the lamp is.

I don't completely understand the question :redface:,

but it looks as if it's about the angle of total internal reflection. :wink:
 


pictures always help in my opinion, and you use what Tiny-Tim stated

ERZlp.jpg
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top