Radius of centripetal force when on an angle.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the calculation of the radius of centripetal force for a bead on an angled hoop. Initial confusion arises regarding the relationship between the radius of the hoop and the radius of the circular path made by the bead, with participants clarifying that the radius of motion is not simply the hoop's radius but depends on the angle. The calculations presented show that using the full radius of the hoop can yield a correct answer, despite the theoretical expectation that the radius should be adjusted for the angle. Ultimately, the thread emphasizes the importance of correctly applying trigonometric relationships in centripetal force equations. The conversation concludes with a resolution of the initial misunderstanding regarding the calculations.
Esoremada
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
http://puu.sh/4IjIT.png

I don't quite understand why this is correct. My initial try was this... (the only difference is at the end, bolded)

r = 0.154m
period = 0.426s
rev per second = 1/0.426s
w = 2*pi*(1/0.426)

mg = Fn*cosx
Fn = mg/cosx
Fc = Fn*sinx = mg/cosx
= mg*tanx

mg*tanx = mv^2/r
mg*tanx = m(r*sinx)w^2
g*tanx = (r*sinx)*w^2
9.8*tan(x) = 0.154*sinx*[2*pi*(1/0.426)]^2

EDIT: So this way does work, why did the way in the screenshot get the same answer?
EDIT 2: Oh... I just did it wrong and coincidentally got a close enough answer to round to the right answer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Esoremada said:
So why is the radius of the rotation about the y-axis constantly equal to the given radius of the ring, shouldn't the distance from the bead to the centre of rotation depend on the angle of the bead?

If the bead was at a 1 degree angle from the vertical, the circle of motion it makes would be nowhere near 15cm. I don't get why the radius in the equation mv^2/r or mrw^2 wouldn't be r*sinx.
You are correct. The radius of the circular path made by the bead is not the radius of the hoop.
 
Doc Al said:
You are correct. The radius of the circular path made by the bead is not the radius of the hoop.

So why did I get the correct answer by using the full radius of the hoop as the path made by the bead?

When I use my way I get 90 degrees, so it's definitely wrong.

EDIT: Did the math wrong, my way does work.

9.8*tan(x) = 0.154*sinx*[2*pi*(1/0.426)]^2
9.8/cosx = 0.154*[2*pi*(1/0.426)]^2
9.8 = cosx*(0.154*[2*pi*(1/0.426)]^2)
arccos(9.8 / [0.154*[2*pi*(1/0.426)]^2]) = 73
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top