Radius of helical motion in a magetic field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the radius of helical motion for a charged particle entering a magnetic field at an angle x. The initial equation derived is r = mv/qbsinx, indicating that the radius is dependent on the sine of the angle. However, confusion arises regarding the proportionality to sinx, particularly when considering the case where x equals 0, which would suggest an infinite radius, contradicting the physical scenario. Participants clarify that the force acting on the charge is never zero when the angle is between 0 and 90 degrees, emphasizing the importance of the angle in calculating curvature. Overall, the relationship between radius and angle in magnetic fields is a key point of discussion.
wai1997401
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


When the charge enters the magnetic feld at an angle x , how the radius can be expressed as?


Homework Equations


Force of charge in a magentic field = qvbsinx
centripetal force = mv^2/r

The Attempt at a Solution


when i combined the two equations above, i got r=mv/qbsinx,
but the question i did said the radius is directly proportional to sinx. What i have done wrong?Hope someone can help me :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Seems to me your answer is correct. What if the angle x = 0? What does your answer give for r for this case? Does it make sense?

What would r be for x = 0 if r were proportional to sinx? Would that make sense?
 
comment: 2) Force applied to the moving charge is q v B sinθ ... Force "of" the charge sounds like the charge is applying that Force.

If the Force is zero, the curvature is zero ... curvature is proportional to sinθ.
I hope you mis-read the question's "discussion".
 
but the angle x is a θ less then 90 degrees but bigger than 0 degree...the force applied is never 0
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top