Rail guns for launching projectiles to space

  • Thread starter Thread starter qwertasdf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Projectiles Space
AI Thread Summary
Rail gun technology, based on electromagnetic propulsion, has potential for launching projectiles into space, but significant challenges remain. The required length of a rail gun to safely accelerate payloads without causing physical harm limits its feasibility for human transport. Current capabilities only allow for small projectiles to reach speeds of about 7 km/s, far below the escape velocity of over 11 km/s. Additionally, issues such as air resistance and rapid wear on the rails present further obstacles. While rail guns could complement existing rocket technologies, they are not yet viable for practical space launches.
qwertasdf
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
What can you say about using the rail gun technology, which works under the principle of electromagnetic propulsion, in sending projectiles to outer space? Is it possible in the mere future? How can it help our soceity?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Isn't a maglev train essentially using a rail gun propulsion system? In that case, the benefit to society is evident.

I think that one of the limiting factors in sending projectiles into space (with people on board to control the projectile) with a rail gun is the length of the rail gun required to ensure that the acceleration generated is not too high at any moment to do phsyical damage. ie, you need to accelerate people at about the same rate as a rocket would up to escape velocity, which would require a pretty long rail gun. I think there have been concepts drawn up to use systems like this. It would probably be benenificial if used in combination with current techniques. Say, use a rail accelerator up to a certain point whereafter rockets take over. The benefit being that you need less fuel in your rockets less weight in your entire system.
 
The main problem is air resistance.
Escape velocity is >11km/s or about Mach 30. A conventional rocket leaves the pad at low speed and accelerates as it gains altitude, so it travels at minimum speed in the thickest air and higher speed as the air becomes thinner.
A projectile has it's highest speed as it leaves the barrel - in the thickest air.
 
Main problem is, you can't find anyone to put up the huge capital investment required to build one of your giant satellite-launching guns.

So then you shop around and finally end up building your giant gun for some Middle-Eastern dictator, and before you know what's happening, you've been assassinated by an intelligence agency.

True story of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerald_Bull" . Read up about it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
First off, maglev and railguns are most certainly not the same thing. They both involve magnetic fields, but that is about the end of the similarity.

I don't think anyone has reached the 11 km/s range with a rail gun yet, for any projectiles at all. For some very tiny projectiles, they have gotten up to about 7 km/s, but for anything bigger than a bb, the max is about 4 km/s. So,... as a launcher, it has a ways to go. And the power requirements are HUGE!

They also tend to burn up rails really fast, so that they are only good for a few shots (<20). It is a fascinating technology, but it has a ways to go before it is useful for very much other than knocking holes in armor plate.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
28
Views
6K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top