Raising and lowering operators homework

[holden]

Having a lot of trouble with this one. I'm given that the Hamiltonian of a certain particle can be expressed by H = A(a+a) + B(aa+), where A and B are constants and a+ and a are the raising and lowering operators, respectively. I'm supposed to find the energies of the stationary states for the particle.

I'm also given that the operators satisfy the communtation relation [a, a+] = 1. So from this I'm getting aa_+\psi - a_+a\psi = \psi. From the Hamiltonian I have A(a_+a)\psi + B(aa_+)\psi = E\psi. I tried using the first equation to replace one of the terms on the left side in the second, to get A(aa_+\psi - \psi) + B(aa_+\psi) = E\psi... but I don't see how this really helps. I'm stuck on what to do next, so any help would be appreciated :)

 

[holden]

Anybody have a clue on what I could do next? Even an inkling of an idea? Because I'm really lost. Do I need to provide more info? Thanks :)

 

[nrqed]

Anybody have a clue on what I could do next? Even an inkling of an idea? Because I'm really lost. Do I need to provide more info? Thanks :)

Looks like nobody is helping so here are some thoughts

Recall that for the h.o. H = (a_+a_- +{1 \over2}) = a_- a_+ - { 1\over 2})(in units of \hbar \omega).

Then one shows that is \psi_n is a solution with energy E_n, a_+ \psi_n is also a asolution, with energy E_n + 1, and a_- \psi_n is a solution with energy E_n - 1.

Then one imposes that for the ground state, a_- \psi_0 = 0 and one uses H \psi_0 = E_0 to find E_0 and the ground state wavefunction. Then one uses the raising operator to find all the energies and the excited states.

Just go through exactly all the same steps. The difference is that in your case, you will get a slightly different relation for the relation between the energy of psi_n and of a_+ \psi_n and a different expression for the ground state energy and so on. But the steps are all the same.

I hope this helps.

Patrick

 

[Hurkyl]

I tried using the first equation to replace one of the terms on the left side in the second, to get A(aa_+\psi - \psi) + B(aa_+\psi) = E\psi... but I don't see how this really helps. I'm stuck on what to do next, so any help would be appreciated :)

It would probably help to group like terms. I.E.

(A + B) a a_+ \psi = (E - A) \psi

a a_+ \psi = \frac{E - A}{A+B} \psi

 

[holden]

Thanks guys. I think I did it in a convoluted way (before I saw your post, Hurkyl), but I ended up getting that a- operating on a state of energy E would give a state of energy E - A - B, and a+ operating on a state of energy E would give a state of energy E + A + B, which seems to make at least a little sense.

Using this, for the ground state I got E0 = A + B. So that means E1 = 2A + 2B, etc.. so my question is when do I know when to stop? Am I just looking for a general formula, which would just be En = (n+1)(A+B)? Or have I screwed it up.

Thanks so much for the help. This was a fun problem once I knew what I was doing :)

 

[nrqed]

Thanks guys. I think I did it in a convoluted way (before I saw your post, Hurkyl), but I ended up getting that a- operating on a state of energy E would give a state of energy E - A - B, and a+ operating on a state of energy E would give a state of energy E + A + B, which seems to make at least a little sense.

Using this, for the ground state I got E0 = A + B. So that means E1 = 2A + 2B, etc.. so my question is when do I know when to stop? Am I just looking for a general formula, which would just be En = (n+1)(A+B)? Or have I screwed it up.

Thanks so much for the help. This was a fun problem once I knew what I was doing :)

Are you sure your ground state energy is right?
The hamiltonian you gave in your first post was A a_+ a_- + B a_- a_+ = (A+B) a_+ a_- + B, right? Applied on the ground state the lowering operator should give zero so that the ground state energy should be B, no?

The general formula will indeed be of the simple form C_1 + C_2 n where C1 and C2 will be functions of A and B.

Patrick

 

[holden]

The hamiltonian you gave in your first post was A a_+ a_- + B a_- a_+ = (A+B) a_+ a_- + B, right?

I'm not sure where the right half of that equation is coming from :(. I got the ground state energy by just saying a_-\psi_0 = 0 and [A(a_+a_-) + B(a_-a_+)]\psi_0 = E_0, and since a- operating on a state of energy E gives a state of energy (E - A - B), I reasoned that a- operating on E0 must give E0 - A - B = 0. So E0 would be A + B. I probably did mess up somewhere though =/

 

[nrqed]

I'm not sure where the right half of that equation is coming from :(.

I just rewrote a_- a_+ = a_+ a_- + 1 in your original hamiltonian.

I got the ground state energy by just saying a_-\psi_0 = 0 and [A(a_+a_-) + B(a_-a_+)]\psi_0 = E_0, and since a- operating on a state of energy E gives a state of energy (E - A - B), I reasoned that a- operating on E0 must give E0 - A - B = 0. So E0 would be A + B. I probably did mess up somewhere though =/

I see what you did. But that's not what we do in the usual harmonic oscillator problem. We assume that a_- \psi_0 0 without saying anything about the energy. If we used the same reasoning you used, we would say E_0 - \hbar \omega =0 so the ground state energy would be \hbar \omega but that's not the correct answer. Instead, we assume a_- \psi_0 = 0 without any condition on the energy. We get the energy by applying the hamiltonian.

Hope this makes sense

Patrick

 

[holden]

OK, I see what you're saying. But since I don't know the lowering function explicitly here.. how can I calculate a_-\psi_0?

 

[nrqed]

OK, I see what you're saying. But since I don't know the lowering function explicitly here.. how can I calculate a_-\psi_0?

we simply *define* this to be zero (so that there is a state of minimum energy). If there was not such a state of lower energy, the particle could jump down forever, and we would have a source of infinite energy.

So the key point is that we *define* psi_0 by imposing a_- \psi_0 = 0. *then* you go back to the hamiltonian which you apply on the ground state and that gives you the ground state energy. If you go back to the harmonic oscillator, this is the logic followed.

Hope this makes sense

Patrick

 

[holden]

OK, maybe we didn't use that approach in my class because I can't find anything about it in my notes or text. So if we apply the hamiltonian to the ground state.. you get [A(a_+a_-) + B(a_-a_+)]\psi_0 = E_0. So since a_-\psi_0 = 0, you're just left with Ba_-(a_+\psi_0) = E_0.. which is Ba_-(E_1 + A + B) = E_0 and then BE_0 = E_0, which is clearly not right. Where did I go wrong?

 

[nrqed]

OK, maybe we didn't use that approach in my class because I can't find anything about it in my notes or text. So if we apply the hamiltonian to the ground state.. you get [A(a_+a_-) + B(a_-a_+)]\psi_0 = E_0. So since a_-\psi_0 = 0, you're just left with Ba_-(a_+\psi_0) = E_0.. which is Ba_-(E_1 + A + B) = E_0 and then BE_0 = E_0, which is clearly not right. Where did I go wrong?

a_+ \psi_0 is *not* (E_1 +A + B) \psi_0! All you know is that a_+ \psi_0 gives a state [itex ] \psi_1 [/itex] with an energy E_0 + A + B (I did not check this part of your calculation, I assume it's right).

By the way, you must be careful about not dropping the wavefunction (which you did in what you wrote).

No, what you do is to use the commutator to rewrite a_- a_+ = a_+ a_- +1 which *then* you apply to the ground state wavefunction. At this stage of the calculation you certainly don't want to apply the raising operator and get psi_1 all mixed in in your calculation.

What textbook are you using? You could see what I mean by looking at their derivation of the ground state energy.

Patrick

 

[holden]

Sigh. Sorry. I feel like an idiot.

OK. Thanks for spelling that out for me. So I did what you said and got a_-a_+\psi_0 = \psi_0. Applying the Hamiltonian and then using that, you get:

[A(a_+a_-) + B(a_-a_+)]\psi_0 = E_0\psi_0
[(A(a_+a_-) + B]\psi_0 = E_0\psi_0
E_0\psi_0 = B\psi_0

So E0 is just B. E1 is A + 2B, E2 is 2A + 3B, etc., and in general it's just En = An + B(n+1). I *think* this is what you were saying earlier.