Raising and Lowering Operators

  • Thread starter Thread starter jjohnson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
jjohnson
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In Griffith and Shankar, the raising and lowering operator seem to appear from nowhere, but it seems really elegant.

Where do they come from, is it some corollary from certain mathematical structure?

Can anyone give a brief explanation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In which context? There are lowering and raising operators for the harmonic oscillator, angular-momentum eigenstates (closely related by the way due to the SU(N) symmetry of the N-dimensional symmetric harmonic oscillator) and for free-particle modes in QFT.
 
Thank you for replying.
So for harmonic oscillator, all dimensions are separable (H = Hx+Hy+Hz), does it depend on dimensionality? Even for one-dimensional harmonic oscillator, we can use raising and lowering operators.

Thanks
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top