Ralphson-Newton Method And Interval Bisection

  • Thread starter Thread starter Procrastinate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interval Method
Procrastinate
Messages
155
Reaction score
0
I know quite well how to do these. However, most of the time, the starting points are just given to me i.e. the a and b values to starting iterating.

I was just wondering if you were to find a starting point for x3-x-1 = 0, what would be the best starting point to use the Ralphson-Newton Method. My notes say 1.5 but I would like to know the reason behind that.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An "educated guess". If x= 1, x^3- x- 1= 1- 1- 1= -2 and if x= 2, x^3- x- 1= 8- 2- 1= 5. Since the polynomial changes sign between 1 and 2, there is a root between 1 and 2. 1.5, half way between 1 and 2, is a good starting point. That's really applying the "interval bisection" to the first step. But, in fact, any number in the vicinity of 1 and 2 will work.

You might even do this: y goes from -2 to 5, a difference of 7. To go to 0 from -2 is just a difference of 2 so perhaps 2/7 of the way from 1 to 2, 1.289, would be better. (That's the "secant" method.) But that only changes the number of iterations to get the same accuracy by, maybe, one or two. Frankly, I would have been inclined to start with x= 1.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top