Raman Spectroscopy: Stokes and Anti-Stokes Wavelengths

AI Thread Summary
In Raman spectroscopy, Stokes wavelengths are always longer and anti-Stokes wavelengths are shorter than the excitation laser wavelength. This leads to the use of edge filters that are slightly longer than the laser wavelength, such as using a 534 or 538 nm filter for a 532 nm laser, to isolate the Stokes lines. The edge filter effectively allows only the Stokes lines to pass through while blocking the laser light. The choice of which lines to analyze depends on the specific application of Raman spectroscopy being employed. Understanding this principle is crucial for effectively interpreting Raman spectra.
sebitab
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi, For someone my question could be very simple but I couldn't find a well explain paper that explain this to me.

In a Raman spectrometer the stokes and anti-stokes wavelength will always be grater than the laser wavelength used?.

I have this confusion because I saw that Raman spectrometers commonly use an edge filter that is usually a couple o nm grater than the laser wavelength.

For example for a 532nm use a 534 or 538nm edge filter to reflect only the stokes and anti-stokes wavelength.

If some one can explain this to me I will appreciate it.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By definition the Stokes lines have a longer wavelength and the anti-Stokes lines a shorter wavelength.
So if you have an edge filter with a wavelength longer than your excitation source, you should only be seeing the Stokes lines. Which lines you want to look at depends on the kind of Raman spectroscopy you're doing.
 
Thank you very mauch alxm.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?

Similar threads

Back
Top