Ramp With Friction - Help Appreciated

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nfinley1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Ramp
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction for a mass sliding down an inclined plane and then stopping on a level surface. The user is unsure about the approach and is considering using potential energy and kinematic equations. They have attempted calculations using the final and initial velocities but are struggling to find the correct coefficient of friction. Suggestions include drawing Free Body Diagrams for better visualization and focusing on energy conservation principles. The user is actively seeking guidance to clarify their understanding and solve the problem effectively.
Nfinley1
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Ramp With Friction - Help Appreciated!

Homework Statement


When mass M is at the position shown, it is sliding down the inclined part of a slide at a speed of 2.41 m/s. The mass stops a distance S2 = 1.9 m along the level part of the slide. The distance S1 = 1.22 m and the angle θ = 37.10°. Calculate the coefficient of kinetic friction for the mass on the surface.

Homework Equations



I'm unsure what to use.

The Attempt at a Solution



So to start off am I looking for the height it starts off at.
So 1.22Sin(37.1)

Then am I looking for Potential Energy? and such. I'm lost from here

I'm not for someone to solve this for me, but someone who could help me get through this would be awesome! :)

Thanks,
Nick
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Nfinley1 said:

Homework Statement


When mass M is at the position shown, it is sliding down the inclined part of a slide at a speed of 2.41 m/s. The mass stops a distance S2 = 1.9 m along the level part of the slide. The distance S1 = 1.22 m and the angle θ = 37.10°. Calculate the coefficient of kinetic friction for the mass on the surface.

Homework Equations



I'm unsure what to use.

The Attempt at a Solution



So to start off am I looking for the height it starts off at.
So 1.22Sin(37.1)

Then am I looking for Potential Energy? and such. I'm lost from here

I'm not for someone to solve this for me, but someone who could help me get through this would be awesome! :)

Thanks,
Nick
Please post the figure, and give more detail regarding your attempts at solving this.

While you're at it, please give the complete problem with the exact wording.
 


prob27a_MechEnWFriction_zps113f14db.gif


When mass M is at the position shown, it is sliding down the inclined part of a slide at a speed of 2.41 m/s. The mass stops a distance S2 = 1.9 m along the level part of the slide. The distance S1 = 1.22 m and the angle θ = 37.10°. Calculate the coefficient of kinetic friction for the mass on the surface. This is all the information given.

I'll post more of my work on the subject in a moment, as I'm still working on even getting my first full attempt done.

Thus far, I've brainstormed a bunch of ideas...
Tried thinking about the component of gravity going along the horizontal axis until I realized I don't have a mass.
Then I thought about using a = mu * g solving for a and then use Vf^2 = Vo^2 + 2aS2. But I realized I am solving for Mu anyways. So I can't exactly plug it into get another constant.

So in all terms, I'm lost.

I tried
Vf^2 = Vo^2 + 2aS2
0 = (2.41m/s)^2 +2(a)(1.9)
0 = (5.5081) + 2a *1.9
A = 1.4495

Then mu = a/g
1.4495/9.8 = 0.1479 = mu Which is the incorrect answer.

found out 2.41^2 is actually 5.8081, and that would make mu = 0.155964, but still not correct.
 
Last edited:


That is all very helpful.

I assume that the coefficient of kinetic friction is the same at all places along the path of the object.

One thing that I find helpful -- I always had my students do this -- is to draw a Free Body Diagram.

Actually, draw one for the object (mass) when it's on the incline and one when it's on the level.
 

Attachments

  • prob27a_MechEnWFriction_zps113f14db.gif
    prob27a_MechEnWFriction_zps113f14db.gif
    1.4 KB · Views: 528


It might be easier to think it in terms of energy.
 


Finding time to work on this during the week is hard for me. I'm going to review my work now and keep at it.

Thanks, I'll post more here later. (Just wanted you guys to know I wasn't leaving it for dead).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top