Random process of uniform- graphing and pdf

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a random process defined as N(t, a) = At, where A follows a uniform continuous distribution over the interval (0, 3). The tasks include sketching sample functions for specific values of 'a' and finding the probability density function (PDF) of a transformed random variable.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express confusion regarding the notation and terminology used in the problem. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between the variables and the nature of the random process. Some participants suggest that 'a' may represent a random sample value from A, leading to interpretations of N(t, 1) and N(2, a) based on this understanding.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. There is no explicit consensus, but some productive insights have been shared regarding the nature of the random process and its implications.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the vagueness of the problem statement and question the clarity of the notation, which may affect their understanding and approach to the tasks.

cutesteph
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Word for word of the problem:
Let N (t, a) = At be a random process and A is the uniform continuous distribution (0, 3).

(i) Sketch N(t, 1) and N(t, 2) as sample functions of t.


(ii) Find the PDF of N(2, a) = 2A.


Homework Equations


A pdf is 1/3 for x in [0,3]


The Attempt at a Solution



This question is very vague to me. I am not sure where to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cutesteph said:

Homework Statement



Word for word of the problem:
Let N (t, a) = At be a random process and A is the uniform continuous distribution (0, 3).

(i) Sketch N(t, 1) and N(t, 2) as sample functions of t.


(ii) Find the PDF of N(2, a) = 2A.


Homework Equations


A pdf is 1/3 for x in [0,3]


The Attempt at a Solution



This question is very vague to me. I am not sure where to start.

You have both a and A; which one do you mean?
 
I'm not familiar with this notation and terminology. I think it's saying that at time t you take a random sample x from A and get xt as the value of N. Is that right? I can only suppose that 'a' represents the random sample value, but that is strange notation since it is a function of t. Anyway, that leads to interpreting N(t, 1) as being the function of time you would get if the sample from A is always the value 1.
Correspondingly, N(2, a) is the r.v. obtained by taking samples from A and doubling them.
Does that all make sense?
 
haruspex said:
I'm not familiar with this notation and terminology. I think it's saying that at time t you take a random sample x from A and get xt as the value of N. Is that right? I can only suppose that 'a' represents the random sample value, but that is strange notation since it is a function of t. Anyway, that leads to interpreting N(t, 1) as being the function of time you would get if the sample from A is always the value 1.
Correspondingly, N(2, a) is the r.v. obtained by taking samples from A and doubling them.
Does that all make sense?

My guess would be that this type of "random process" is hardly what we usually mean by that terminology: I guess we first choose a random realization 'a' of the random variable A, then for all time we have N(t,a) = a*t. That amounts to choosing a random slope for a line, but from then on having a deterministic line. Or so, that is what I read into the problem.
 
Ray Vickson said:
My guess would be that this type of "random process" is hardly what we usually mean by that terminology: I guess we first choose a random realization 'a' of the random variable A, then for all time we have N(t,a) = a*t. That amounts to choosing a random slope for a line, but from then on having a deterministic line. Or so, that is what I read into the problem.
Yes, I think that comes to the same as what I wrote, but better expressed.
 
Ray Vickson said:
My guess would be that this type of "random process" is hardly what we usually mean by that terminology: I guess we first choose a random realization 'a' of the random variable A, then for all time we have N(t,a) = a*t. That amounts to choosing a random slope for a line, but from then on having a deterministic line. Or so, that is what I read into the problem.

That makes sense now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
56
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K