Rarefaction? How is it formed. Sound (Simple question)

  • Thread starter Thread starter sameeralord
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sound
AI Thread Summary
Rarefaction occurs when an object vibrates, creating compressions and subsequent expansions in air pressure. When an object moves forward, it compresses air, and as it moves back, the surrounding air expands to fill the low-pressure area created, resulting in rarefaction. This phenomenon can be understood through the interaction of adjacent air parcels within a sealed environment, where one parcel's compression forces the other to expand. The oscillation of air molecules contributes to this effect, as they move back and forth around their rest positions. Overall, rarefaction is a result of the dynamic behavior of air molecules in response to vibrations.
sameeralord
Messages
659
Reaction score
3
Rarefaction? How is it formed. Sound!(Simple question)

Hello everyone,

Simple question. If a object vibrates forward causing a compression and then vibrate back wouldn't it regain the normal air pressure (end up at the same place). How does it lower the air pressure and cause rarefaction by moving back. Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Simple question, I guess you want a simple answer then!

Consider a parcel of air, in fact, consider two adjacent parcels of air. Now put them in a perfectly rigid box (so its volume can't change) and let the box be perfectly sealed (so no mass can escape/get in). Now compress one of the parcels of air; what must happen to the other parcel of air?

Remember "nature abhors a vacuum" [one of the reasons you can hold liquid in a straw when you cover the top with your finger, even though the bottom of the straw is open, is because if water dropped out of the bottom there would be nothing to fill the vacated space at top of the straw]. So the other parcel of air will expand to fill the gap - we have rarefaction.

I wouldn't think too much in terms of particles, particles themselves don't change size, they just get bunched closer together or farther apart. If we looked at the motion of particles we would see that they oscillate, a bit like a loaded spring really. And that just like a loaded spring that has been disturbed, particles will oscillate about their rest position.
 


Also the air doesn't move as a single entity. The molecules closest to the object move back more quickly than those farther way. That increases the distance between them and you have "rarefaction".
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top