Rate of Flow of water out of can

  • Thread starter Thread starter pacelweb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flow Rate Water
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around modeling the rate of flow of water out of a can with a hole, using mathematical functions and differential equations. The original poster presents an experiment with data on water depth over time and references Torricelli's equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive a function to predict water depth based on experimental data, questioning the physical meaning of the constant k in their model. Some participants suggest corrections to the differential equation and explore alternative formulations based on Torricelli's equation.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering suggestions for correcting the original equation and discussing the implications of different mathematical forms. There is a focus on fitting the model to the experimental data, with some guidance provided regarding the interpretation of constants in the equations.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses uncertainty about the appropriateness of the forum category for their question, indicating a potential overlap between mathematics and introductory physics concepts.

pacelweb
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In my Further Maths class today...

1. Produce a function which can b used to predict the depth of water in a can with a hole in it
The experiment, conducted by a friend and I, gave results of the height left from times 0s to 1010s. At t=0, depth (h) = 0.125m

Homework Equations


Torricelli's equation v=\sqrt{2gh}

The Attempt at a Solution


We can deduce by inspection of a graph plotted of the data that the rate of flow out of the can is proportional to the height left (Note this is a decay, hence the negative):
\frac{dh}{dt}\propto{-h}

\frac{dh}{dt}=-kt

Solving the differential equation we get:
h=Ae^{-kt}

Substituting t=0, A=0.125m
h=0.125e^{-kt}

Attempting to find k, and using autograph, I substituted different values of t and their corresponding values of h from my results. However, I found that t was different in each case- the higher the value of t, the higher value of k; or graphically, using a lower value or k, the function fits the data at low values of t, for higher values of k the function is a better fit at higher t values.
I cannot figure out in my mind what physical property(ies) k represents. There was a hint from my teacher that velocity may play a part, and I have looked at Torricelli's v=\sqrt{}2gh but cannot link into how this would help me.

Could anyone suggest what k may actually represent?

P.S sorry if this should be in Introductory Physics, but as we have done it in our maths lesson I naturally put it in here...
Many thanks, Philip Wiseman
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm confused. Don't you mean dh/dt = -kh rather than dt/dh = -kt? The first equation suggests that the rate of change of height is proportional to the height of water remaining in the can. I can't think of any physical meaning for the second equation.

Since you are having trouble fitting your data to your solution curve, it might be that your basic differential equation doesn't fit reality. Torrecelli's equation says that velocity is proportional to h1/2, and we can infer from that, that the rate of change of volume is likewise proportional to h1/2. This would say that dV/dt = -kh1/2. To get this in terms of h, notice that the volume of water in the can depends on the fixed radius of the can and the height of water, so dV/dt is proportional to dh/dt, hence dh/dt = -Kh1/2, where K is different from k, and both are positive.
 
Thanks, I have now changed it to dh/dt in stead of dt/dh.
Would I then solve to find h, giving 2h1/2=-Kt + c ?
 
Yes, so h = (-2Kt + C')^2, where C' = 2C. And you know that at t = 0, h = .125 m, so you can solve for C', which should be sqrt(.125).

Now, if you can fiddle with K so that your data fits this curve, then you'll have a good idea you're on the track that your teacher suggested in the hint.

As for a physical meaning for K, I would think it's probably related to the size and shape of the outlet hole.
 
Thanks very much. I will give it a go in autograph tomorrow.
I went in today to find that I was the only one who'd even attempted it!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K