Rate of radiation coming from inside a container

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the radiation rate from a source inside an aluminum container with 23 mm thick walls, where an external detector measures 542 Hz. The half-life of the radiation source is 2.4 years, and the half-length of aluminum is approximately 48.36 mm. Initial attempts to solve the problem using proportions were unsuccessful, leading to the suggestion of using the exponential law of intensity decrease. The formula I = I_0 2^{l/L} is recommended for accurately determining the internal radiation rate. Ultimately, the correct approach involves understanding the exponential decay of radiation through the container's material.
cyclonefb3
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A aluminum container has walls that are 23 mm thick. A radiation detector measures a rate of 542 Hz outside the container. The radiation source inside the container has a half-life of 2.4 years. What is the rate of radiation from the source inside the container?

Homework Equations



x1/2=ln2/u

u= 0.014 mm-1
x1/2=48.26 mm

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to solve this problem using proportions, and it didn't work. Is there another way?

23 mm is 47% of aluminums half-length (48.36 mm). so the amount of radiation change from inside to outside should be 50% of 47% of aluminums half-lenght.

so 542*23.5% = 127.3

542+127.3 = 669.3 Hz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Proportion doesn't work here. You should use the exponential law of decrease in intension:

I = I_0 2^{l/L}

where l is the length of absorbing material and L is the half-lenght.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top