Ratio of functions, surjective (analysis course)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves analyzing the surjectivity of a function g defined as g(x) = x^k + f(x), where f is a continuous function and k is an integer greater than or equal to 1. The limits of f(x)/x^k as x approaches positive and negative infinity are given to be 0.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the behavior of g and its relationship to the function f, particularly as x approaches infinity and negative infinity. There is an exploration of the implications of the limits provided and how they affect the surjectivity of g. Some participants suggest using the intermediate value theorem to support the argument for surjectivity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing insights about the qualitative behavior of the functions involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of the intermediate value theorem, but there is still uncertainty about its application in proving surjectivity.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the continuity of g and the behavior of f relative to x^k as x approaches infinity. The participants are considering the implications of k being odd or even on the surjectivity of g.

riskandar
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


let f: R->R be a continuous function
Suppose k>=1 is an integer such that

lim f(x)/x^k = lim f(x)/x^k = 0
x->inf x->-inf

set g(x)= x^k + f(x)

g: R->R

Prove that
(i) if k is odd, then g is surjective
(ii) if k is even, then there is a real number y such that the image of g is [y,inf)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I am completely stuck at this all I can think of is x^k goes to infinity then the ratio of the functions can go to 0 if either f(x) goes to 0 or f(x) is a constant or f(x) goes to infinity slower than x^k (I am not sure about this)

Any help will be very much appreciateve
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because [tex]g[/tex] is continuous, you can use the intermediate value theorem. To show that [tex]g[/tex] is surjective, it is enough to show that [tex]g[/tex] becomes both very large and very large negative.

To prove this part, you need to think about the qualitative behavior of [tex]f[/tex] and [tex]g[/tex]. The hypothesis on [tex]f[/tex] says that [tex]f(x)[/tex] is negligible compared to [tex]x^k[/tex] as [tex]|x|[/tex] becomes large. Therefore [tex]g(x)[/tex] should "behave almost like" [tex]x^k[/tex] as [tex]|x|[/tex] becomes large. Figure out a way to make this precise.
 
ystael said:
Because [tex]g[/tex] is continuous, you can use the intermediate value theorem. To show that [tex]g[/tex] is surjective, it is enough to show that [tex]g[/tex] becomes both very large and very large negative.

To prove this part, you need to think about the qualitative behavior of [tex]f[/tex] and [tex]g[/tex]. The hypothesis on [tex]f[/tex] says that [tex]f(x)[/tex] is negligible compared to [tex]x^k[/tex] as [tex]|x|[/tex] becomes large. Therefore [tex]g(x)[/tex] should "behave almost like" [tex]x^k[/tex] as [tex]|x|[/tex] becomes large. Figure out a way to make this precise.

Thank you for the reply.
Where do I use the intermediate value theorem? Is it to prove surjective?
 
riskandar said:
Thank you for the reply.
Where do I use the intermediate value theorem? Is it to prove surjective?

Yes.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K