Ratio of molar mass 2 component ideal solution

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the ratio of the molar mass of two components in an ideal solution based on their vapor pressures. Given the vapor pressures and the mass of the components, the mole fraction of component 1 is determined to be 0.947. The calculations lead to a molar mass ratio of component 1 to component 2 as approximately 0.5597. Participants emphasize the importance of not rounding intermediate results to maintain accuracy. The final ratio, after considering significant digits, is confirmed to be around 0.5556.
sandra
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Component 1 and 2 form an ideal solution. The vapor pressure of pure component 1 is 13.3kPa at 298K, and the corresponding vapor pressure of component 2 is approximately zero. If the addition of 1.00 g of component 2 to 10.0g of component 1 reduces the total vapor pressure to 12.6 kPa, find the ratio of the molar mass of component 2 to that of component 1.

Homework Equations


x1 = p/p*
x1 = n1/(n1+n2)
n2=n1(1/x1-1)

The Attempt at a Solution


x1 = p/p* = 12.6/13.3 = 0.947
Mass of component 1 = m1
n1 = 10g/m1
x1 = n1/(n1+n2)
n1+n2= n1/x1
n2=n1(1/x1-1)
=10/m1(1/0.947 - 1) = 0.5597/m1
m2=1/(0.5597/m1) = m1/0.5597
m1/m2 = 0.5597
Can anybody tell me if this looks right? thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Close. Have you used rounded down 0.947 for calculations? You should not round down intermediate results.

--
methods
 
If I don't round I get m1/m2=0.5556
Is that right? Thanks!
 
Watch significant digits.

--
methods
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top