Ratio of projectile to ejecta mass, shoot the moon.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between the mass of a projectile and the resulting ejecta mass when impacting the moon's surface at high speeds. A formula suggests that for steel projectiles ranging from 1 cm to 10 m, the mass of the projectile is roughly proportional to the volume of ejecta, with a more complex relationship for larger sizes. The impact conditions, such as whether the projectile strikes dust or rock, may influence the ejecta mass. The conversation also touches on the concept of scale invariance, indicating that a single representation can apply to various projectile masses and ejecta volumes. Overall, the findings highlight the complexities of impact physics on the moon's surface.
Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
419
Say we shoot the surface of the moon with various sized steel balls of size a cm and larger, say up to a km in size. Say the balls hit the surface of the moon moving at 20,000 mph. Is there a simple formula for the mass of the ejecta as a function of the mass of the projectile? Will the formula depend on whether the projectile hits dust or rock or a combination of the two?

Thanks for any help!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Wow, nice find!
 
Used the above calculator, seemed buggy for multiple calculations, and got the following result. For a steel projectile striking the moon at 10,000 mph perpendicularly, the mass of the projectile, M, was roughly proportional to the volume, V, of ejecta for sizes from 1 cm to 10 m,

M ≈ V

above that size

M^α ≈ V

Where α is less then 1.

Is the above an example of scale invariance? If I draw a picture of the projectile next to the volume of ejecta I can change the scale but not have to redraw the picture, one picture works for a range of projectile masses and ejecta volume?
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top