Ratio of speeds in an elliptic orbit

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mike115
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Orbit Ratio
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the ratio of speeds (Vb/Va) of an object in an elliptical orbit around the sun, specifically comparing the speeds at two points A and B in the orbit, defined by their distances Ra and Rb from the sun. Participants explore the implications of conservation of angular momentum and gravitational forces in the context of elliptical orbits.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that using conservation of angular momentum leads to the conclusion that vB/vA = rA/rB, suggesting velocity is inversely related to distance from the sun.
  • Another participant challenges the use of inertia tensors in this context, stating that the Sun-Earth system is not a rigid body.
  • A different participant agrees with the conservation of angular momentum approach but questions the validity of using centripetal acceleration in non-circular orbits, indicating that the full form of centripetal acceleration must be considered.
  • Another participant provides a derivation using the vis-viva equation, showing that vA/vB = rB/rA, and questions the origin of the alternative answer involving the square root of rA/rB.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct ratio of speeds, with some supporting the angular momentum approach leading to vB/vA = rA/rB, while others reference the vis-viva equation to arrive at a different conclusion. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on which answer is correct.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in applying certain principles, such as the use of centripetal acceleration in elliptical orbits and the appropriateness of inertia tensors in this scenario. The discussion highlights the complexity of the mathematical relationships involved.

mike115
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Ratio of speeds in an elliptic orbit

Hi, I need some clarification on a problem.

The problem is: The diagram shows a view of the Earth's elliptic orbit about the sun. (This was the closest picture I could find.) In terms of Ra (the distance between the sun and point A) and Rb (the distance between the sun and point B), what is the ratio Vb/Va?

Using conservation of angular momentum, L = I*w = m*r^2*v/r = m*r*v,
m*rA*vA = m*rB*vB
vB/vA = rA/rB
So the velocity is inversely related to the distance from the sun.

However, the answer given is the square root of rA/rB. I can get this answer by equating Newton's gravitational law with the centripetal force, but doesn't centripetal acceleration only work for circular orbits?

Which answer is correct?

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • meug1.gif
    meug1.gif
    1.5 KB · Views: 661
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mike115 said:
Using conservation of angular momentum, L = I*w
You can't use an inertia tensor here. Inertia tensors are used to describe the behavior of rigid bodies. The Sun-Earth system is not a rigid body.
 
mike115 said:
Hi, I need some clarification on a problem.

The problem is: The diagram shows a view of the Earth's elliptic orbit about the sun. (This was the closest picture I could find.) In terms of Ra (the distance between the sun and point A) and Rb (the distance between the sun and point B), what is the ratio Vb/Va?

Using conservation of angular momentum, L = I*w = m*r^2*v/r = m*r*v,
m*rA*vA = m*rB*vB
vB/vA = rA/rB
So the velocity is inversely related to the distance from the sun.

The angular momentum is conserved, so this answer is correct.

mike115 said:
However, the answer given is the square root of rA/rB. I can get this answer by equating Newton's gravitational law with the centripetal force, but doesn't centripetal acceleration only work for circular orbits?

Which answer is correct?

Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!


You can' t use centripetal acceleration in the naive form

\vec{a}_r=-r\,\dot{\theta}^2\,\vec{e}_r

in a non-circular orbit. The full form of centripetal acceleration is

\vec{a}_r=(\ddot{r}-r\,\dot{\theta}^2)\,\vec{e}_r

The distance r varies with time so the first term of the left hand side is not zero.

By the way, you can use for the inertia momentum the formula

I=m\,r^2 \quad (1)

since it's definition (for a ridig body) is

I=m_1\,r_1^2+\dots +m_\nu\,r_\nu^2\Rightarrow I=\int r^2\,d\,m

and for a point particle reproduces (1).
 
The Sun-Earth velocity vector is normal to the Sun-Earth position vector at perihelion and apohelion. Thus the magnitude of the angular momentum vector at these points is simply the product of the magnitudes of the Sun-Earth distance and the magnitude of the Sun-Earth velocity vector. Since angular momentum is a conserved quantity,

<br /> v_A r_A = v_B r_B<br />

or

<br /> \frac{v_A}{v_B} = \frac{r_B}{r_A}<br />

The same result can be derived from the vis-viva equation,

v^2=\mu\left(\frac 2 r - \frac 1 a\right)

At apohelion, r_A=(1+e)a and at perihelion, r_B=(1-e)a. Thus

<br /> v_A^2=\mu\left(\frac 2 {r_A} - \frac 1 a\right)<br /> = \frac {\mu}{r_A}(2 - (1+e))<br /> = \frac {\mu}{r_A}(1-e)<br /> = \frac {\mu} a \frac {r_B} {r_A}<br />

Similarly,

<br /> v_B^2=\mu\left(\frac 2 {r_B} - \frac 1 a\right)<br /> = \frac {\mu}{r_B}(2 - (1-e))<br /> = \frac {\mu}{r_B}(1+e)<br /> = \frac {\mu} a \frac {r_A} {r_B}<br />

Thus

<br /> \frac {v_A} {v_B} = \frac {r_B} {r_A} <br />

Conservation of energy and conservation of angular momentum yield the same result.

Where did you get the "answer" v_B/v_a = \sqrt{r_A/r_B}?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K