Ratio of Sun's diameter to Moon's

  • Thread starter Thread starter rtsphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diameter Ratio
AI Thread Summary
To find the ratio of the Sun's diameter to the Moon's diameter during a total solar eclipse, the problem states that the distance from Earth to the Sun is 400 times the distance from Earth to the Moon. The approach involves using similar triangles, where the diameters of the Sun and Moon can be represented as the bases of two triangles formed by their respective distances from Earth. The challenge lies in understanding whether the given distances include the radii of the celestial bodies. Drawing the triangles helps visualize the relationship, and the known side lengths of the Moon's triangle can aid in solving for the Sun's diameter. The solution hinges on correctly applying the principles of similar triangles to derive the desired ratio.
rtsphysics
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


During a total solar eclipse, your view of the Sun is almost exactly replaced by your view of the moon. Assuming that the distance from you to the sun is 400 times the distance from you to the moon, find the ratio of the Sun's diameter to the moon's diameter.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I started by drawing three circles: the Sun at the left of the moon at the left of the Earth. After this, I'm stuck. The problem never states whether the given distances from "you to the moon/sun" include the radius of the moon or sun. Even if it does, I have no idea how to proceed. I read the post about this exact problem (https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=318386), but I didn't get how to use similar triangles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try drawing two similar triangles, one with the moon's diamter as the base and one with the sun's - you know the length of the sides of the moon triangle
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top