Rationalize the denominators problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gughanath
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on simplifying the expression [2 (square root of 2)/[(square root of 3)-1] - [2(square root of 3)]/[(square root of 2)+1]. Participants suggest rationalizing the denominators by multiplying by the conjugate and finding a common denominator. One user emphasizes factoring out a 2 to simplify the process further. Additionally, there is a request for clarification on how to properly format mathematical expressions using LaTeX code. The conversation aims to provide a clearer, simplified version of the original complex fraction.
Gughanath
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
Could some one please express:

[2 (square root of 2)/[(square root of 3)-1] - [2(square root of 3)]/[(square root of 2)+1] in a simpler form. I am sorry if the expression looks completed, i didnt know how to write them properly on the forum, its bascailly a fraction (LHS) - another fraction (RHS). Please help :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gughanath said:
Could some one please express:

[2 (square root of 2)/[(square root of 3)-1] - [2(square root of 3)]/[(square root of 2)+1] in a simpler form. I am sorry if the expression looks completed, i didnt know how to write them properly on the forum, its bascailly a fraction (LHS) - another fraction (RHS). Please help :confused:

The usual thing is to rationalize the denominators, then find common denominators, then combine terms. To rationalize, you have to multiply numerator and denominator of each fraction by the conjugate of the denominator.
 
\frac{2\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{3} -1} - \frac{2\sqrt{3}}{\sqrt{2}+1}

I would factor out a 2 and find a lowest common denominator, then go from there.
 
errmm...just before I continue...could you explain how you wrote that expression?
 
Click it, and on the bottom you should see Latex code reference.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
893
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Back
Top