RC circuit black box circuit modeling

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a mystery box containing resistors of various values and the measurements taken between different terminals. The context is focused on understanding the configuration of resistors within an RC circuit framework, despite the absence of capacitors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the resistance measurements and explore potential configurations of the resistors. There is uncertainty regarding the values of the resistors and the nature of the circuit, with suggestions to consider circuit diagrams for clarity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants questioning the original poster's assumptions about the resistor values and the classification of the circuit. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of circuit diagrams to clarify ideas, but no consensus has been reached on the correct interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential missing information in the problem statement and express concerns about the accuracy of the measurements and the classification of the circuit as an RC circuit.

CookieSalesman
Messages
103
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


I have a red mystery box which contains a 20, 50, 100, and 200,000 ohm resistor (one of each and ONLY one.)

There are three terminals on the box you can plug a voltmeter into... testing A-B I got 60k, testing A-C I got 140k, and testing B-C I get 120k ohms. So this is a bit of a puzzle.

I'm aware of general and relevant equations.

The Attempt at a Solution


I really struggle with this for some reason. It's been a while with RC circuits.

These are pretty large values and it means that no matter what two places you pick, at least some of the current must flow through the 200K ohm resistor I think. Ok I think I can do this... it seems I need to somehow reduce the resistance of the 200,000 ohm resistor by some percentage. But I DO NOT know how to do this without either making the resistance JUST a flat 60 ohms for instance, or I either just make a map so that I get 200,050 ohms...

I tried thinking of something like... starting with the 200K resistor, then as you move along the circuit splits to a parallel junction with 20 and 50. The junction does not connect back to one line. One end leads off from the 20, and another end leaves from the 50 ohm resistor for instance. This sort of arrangement looked good for a moment but the thing is I think that "current" or whatever is measured won't pass through the other resistor at the parallel junction, right!?? So that just becomes 200,020 or 200,050 ohms and it just adds...
I was hoping that for instance if the 20-50 junction came back together, I think I could feasibly squeeze out the right values 60k 140k and 120k if you measured immediately after the 20 or 50 ohm resistor, and before it came back together.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How is this an RC circuit? It contains resistors only, no capacitors.

Are you sure that the 20, 50, and 100 values are Ohms and not k Ohms? I don't see how it would be possible to have all measured results above 170 Ω, let alone in the kΩ range otherwise. Unless it's your measurements that are not correctly scaled?

Rather than describing circuits in text form it would be much better to post sketches of your ideas. A circuit diagram conveys information more efficiently without the possibility of misinterpretation.
 
I see what you mean. Maybe the resitances are 20kohm 50kohm and so. Anyway I would try first to work with a t or delta model to see which values of recistance I get. Still I think there is something missing in the problem statement.
 
Ohhhhhhhhhhhh you might be right there...

This may just be stupidly lazy TA's at work... I spent an hour trying these diagrams.

Thanks both.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K