Real Analysis: Convergence of Trigonometric Series on R

annastm
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Consider the series

1+ Σ((1/(2^k))coskx + (1/(2^k))sinkx)

(a) Show that series converges for each x in R.
(b) Call the sum of the series f(x) and show that f is continuous on R = real numbers

My thoughts:

From trig => cos + sin = 1. So, is it something like
|coskx + sinkx| / |2^k| < or = (in particular = ) 1/2^k = M. Then since ΣM = Σ(1/2^k) converges (since 1/2^n approaches 0, even though it never attains it) Thus the given series converges uniformly and therefore converges. Adding 1 will not change the fact that it converges.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is your problem. What have you done on it?
 
This is what I've done:
My thoughts:

From trig => cos + sin = 1. So, is it something like
|coskx + sinkx| / |2^k| < or = (in particular = ) 1/2^k = M. Then since ΣM = Σ(1/2^k) converges (since 1/2^n approaches 0, even though it never attains it) Thus the given series converges uniformly and therefore converges. Adding 1 will not change the fact that it converges.
Can you please correct me?
 
annastm said:
This is what I've done:
My thoughts:

From trig => cos + sin = 1. So, is it something like
|coskx + sinkx| / |2^k| < or = (in particular = ) 1/2^k = M. Then since ΣM = Σ(1/2^k) converges (since 1/2^n approaches 0, even though it never attains it) Thus the given series converges uniformly and therefore converges. Adding 1 will not change the fact that it converges.
Can you please correct me?

Well, for starters, cos\theta+sin\theta \neq 1. What you are looking for is cos^2\theta+sin^2\theta=1.

-Dan
 
And nor is it even true that cos(x)+sin(x)<1 for all x, but one can do something with the abs value, or one can just appeal to any of the comparison tests.

Further, when you say .

"Then since ΣM = Σ(1/2^k) converges (since 1/2^n approaches 0, even though it never attains it)"

please tell me that you don't think the terms tend to zero implies the sum converges. If there is exactly one result in analysis that is hammered home ad nauseum it is that this is is clearly false as can be seen just from trying to sum 1/n the simplest series whose terms tend to zero.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top